BWA
Price
$41.42
Change
-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
8.97B
75 days until earnings call
VC
Price
$121.01
Change
-$0.60 (-0.49%)
Updated
Aug 15 closing price
Capitalization
3.32B
68 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWA vs VC

Header iconBWA vs VC Comparison
Open Charts BWA vs VCBanner chart's image
BorgWarner
Price$41.42
Change-$0.03 (-0.07%)
Volume$2.6M
Capitalization8.97B
Visteon
Price$121.01
Change-$0.60 (-0.49%)
Volume$214.55K
Capitalization3.32B
BWA vs VC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWA vs. VC commentary
Aug 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWA is a Hold and VC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 17, 2025
Stock price -- (BWA: $41.45 vs. VC: $121.61)
Brand notoriety: BWA and VC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWA: 99% vs. VC: 51%
Market capitalization -- BWA: $8.97B vs. VC: $3.32B
BWA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.97B. VC’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $86.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileVC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • VC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, VC is a better buy in the long-term than BWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while VC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • VC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BWA and VC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +8.51% price change this week, while VC (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +6.96% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

VC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+2.22% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWA($8.97B) has a higher market cap than VC($3.32B). BWA has higher P/E ratio than VC: BWA (39.10) vs VC (11.58). VC YTD gains are higher at: 37.072 vs. BWA (31.307). BWA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. VC (443M). BWA has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. VC (668M). VC has less debt than BWA: VC (442M) vs BWA (4.08B). BWA has higher revenues than VC: BWA (14B) vs VC (3.82B).
BWAVCBWA / VC
Capitalization8.97B3.32B270%
EBITDA1.27B443M286%
Gain YTD31.30737.07284%
P/E Ratio39.1011.58338%
Revenue14B3.82B366%
Total Cash2.04B668M306%
Total Debt4.08B442M922%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWA vs VC: Fundamental Ratings
BWA
VC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1574
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6466
SMR RATING
1..100
8741
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
540
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

VC's Valuation (67) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BWA (71). This means that VC’s stock grew similarly to BWA’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (66). This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.

VC's SMR Rating (41) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWA (87). This means that VC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWA’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Price Growth Rating (5) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for VC (40). This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than VC’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as VC (7). This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to VC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAVC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
VC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMAP24.780.66
+2.73%
Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
PSMO29.620.01
+0.03%
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (October) ETF
STAX25.50N/A
N/A
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
VTC77.46-0.22
-0.29%
Vanguard Total Corporate Bond ETF
TLTE60.52-0.56
-0.92%
FlexShares Mstar EmgMkts FctTilt ETF

BWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWA
1D Price
Change %
BWA100%
-0.29%
LEA - BWA
77%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
ALV - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
VC - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
ADNT - BWA
71%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
MGA - BWA
69%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
More

VC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, VC has been closely correlated with ADNT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if VC jumps, then ADNT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VC
1D Price
Change %
VC100%
-1.48%
ADNT - VC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
LEA - VC
78%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
BWA - VC
74%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
MGA - VC
73%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
ALV - VC
70%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
More