BWA
Price
$44.03
Change
+$0.18 (+0.41%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
9.53B
54 days until earnings call
MGA
Price
$45.88
Change
+$0.53 (+1.17%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.98B
55 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWA vs MGA

Header iconBWA vs MGA Comparison
Open Charts BWA vs MGABanner chart's image
BorgWarner
Price$44.03
Change+$0.18 (+0.41%)
Volume$2.03M
Capitalization9.53B
Magna International
Price$45.88
Change+$0.53 (+1.17%)
Volume$2.57M
Capitalization12.98B
BWA vs MGA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWA vs. MGA commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWA is a StrongBuy and MGA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BWA: $44.03 vs. MGA: $45.88)
Brand notoriety: BWA and MGA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWA: 95% vs. MGA: 186%
Market capitalization -- BWA: $9.53B vs. MGA: $12.98B
BWA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $9.53B. MGA’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $12.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $88.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.59B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMGA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MGA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BWA and MGA are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MGA’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MGA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BWA and MGA are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +3.38% price change this week, while MGA (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

MGA is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+0.40% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MGA($13B) has a higher market cap than BWA($9.53B). BWA has higher P/E ratio than MGA: BWA (41.54) vs MGA (10.77). BWA YTD gains are higher at: 40.037 vs. MGA (13.977). BWA has more cash in the bank: 901M vs. MGA (488M). BWA has less debt than MGA: BWA (4.08B) vs MGA (8.12B).
BWAMGABWA / MGA
Capitalization9.53B13B73%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD40.03713.977286%
P/E Ratio41.5410.77386%
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total Cash901M488M185%
Total Debt4.08B8.12B50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWA vs MGA: Fundamental Ratings
BWA
MGA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1975
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
12
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6393
SMR RATING
1..100
8870
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
444
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
462
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MGA's Valuation (12) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWA (68). This means that MGA’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWA’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as MGA (93). This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to MGA’s over the last 12 months.

MGA's SMR Rating (70) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as BWA (88). This means that MGA’s stock grew similarly to BWA’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (44). This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MGA (62). This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than MGA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAMGA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MGA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKQ97.181.00
+1.04%
ARK Autonomous Technology&Robotics ETF
RSPC39.480.26
+0.66%
Invesco S&P 500® Eql Wght Comm Svcs ETF
KJAN39.820.18
+0.46%
Innovator US Small Cap Pwr Buff ETF™ Jan
TMDV48.83N/A
N/A
ProShares Russell US Dividend Grwr ETF
XYZY9.32-0.09
-0.96%
YieldMax XYZ Option Income Strategy ETF

BWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWA
1D Price
Change %
BWA100%
+0.41%
LEA - BWA
77%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
ALV - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
VC - BWA
73%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
ADNT - BWA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
MGA - BWA
68%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
More

MGA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MGA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MGA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MGA
1D Price
Change %
MGA100%
+1.17%
LEA - MGA
78%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
ADNT - MGA
74%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
VC - MGA
73%
Closely correlated
-0.22%
ALV - MGA
72%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
BWA - MGA
71%
Closely correlated
+0.41%
More