BWA
Price
$42.06
Change
+$0.64 (+1.55%)
Updated
Aug 18, 03:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.96B
73 days until earnings call
GTX
Price
$12.93
Change
+$0.08 (+0.62%)
Updated
Aug 18, 03:29 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.59B
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWA vs GTX

Header iconBWA vs GTX Comparison
Open Charts BWA vs GTXBanner chart's image
BorgWarner
Price$42.06
Change+$0.64 (+1.55%)
Volume$400
Capitalization8.96B
Garrett Motion
Price$12.93
Change+$0.08 (+0.62%)
Volume$800
Capitalization2.59B
BWA vs GTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWA vs. GTX commentary
Aug 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWA is a Hold and GTX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 18, 2025
Stock price -- (BWA: $41.42 vs. GTX: $12.85)
Brand notoriety: BWA and GTX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWA: 105% vs. GTX: 104%
Market capitalization -- BWA: $8.96B vs. GTX: $2.59B
BWA [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $8.96B. GTX’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $2.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $86.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $6.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWA’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGTX’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWA’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • GTX’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GTX is a better buy in the long-term than BWA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWA’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GTX’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GTX’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWA is a better buy in the short-term than GTX.

Price Growth

BWA (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +7.47% price change this week, while GTX (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was +1.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.26%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWA is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

GTX is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.50% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWA($8.96B) has a higher market cap than GTX($2.59B). BWA has higher P/E ratio than GTX: BWA (39.08) vs GTX (9.05). GTX YTD gains are higher at: 44.035 vs. BWA (31.212). BWA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.27B vs. GTX (574M). BWA has more cash in the bank: 2.04B vs. GTX (232M). GTX has less debt than BWA: GTX (1.52B) vs BWA (4.08B). BWA has higher revenues than GTX: BWA (14B) vs GTX (3.46B).
BWAGTXBWA / GTX
Capitalization8.96B2.59B346%
EBITDA1.27B574M221%
Gain YTD31.21244.03571%
P/E Ratio39.089.05432%
Revenue14B3.46B405%
Total Cash2.04B232M880%
Total Debt4.08B1.52B268%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWA vs GTX: Fundamental Ratings
BWA
GTX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6443
SMR RATING
1..100
87100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
441
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GTX's Valuation (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWA (70) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWA’s over the last 12 months.

GTX's Profit vs Risk Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as BWA (64) in the Auto Parts OEM industry. This means that GTX’s stock grew similarly to BWA’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's SMR Rating (87) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (100) in the null industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's Price Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GTX (41) in the null industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew somewhat faster than GTX’s over the last 12 months.

BWA's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Auto Parts OEM industry is in the same range as GTX (7) in the null industry. This means that BWA’s stock grew similarly to GTX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWAGTX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GTX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCOR47.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF
LCR36.75N/A
N/A
Leuthold Core ETF
STAX25.50N/A
N/A
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
HYGV40.77-0.04
-0.10%
FlexShares HY Val-Scrd Bd
SCDV24.50-0.23
-0.91%
Bahl & Gaynor Small Cap Dividend ETF

BWA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWA has been closely correlated with LEA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWA jumps, then LEA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWA
1D Price
Change %
BWA100%
-0.07%
LEA - BWA
77%
Closely correlated
-0.79%
ALV - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
VC - BWA
74%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
ADNT - BWA
71%
Closely correlated
-1.38%
MGA - BWA
69%
Closely correlated
+0.17%
More

GTX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTX has been loosely correlated with BWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTX jumps, then BWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GTX
1D Price
Change %
GTX100%
-0.23%
BWA - GTX
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
ALV - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.49%
APTV - GTX
43%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
PHIN - GTX
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
LEA - GTX
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More