BW
Price
$2.88
Change
+$0.11 (+3.97%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
291.16M
38 days until earnings call
FLS
Price
$54.05
Change
+$0.39 (+0.73%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
7.07B
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BW vs FLS

Header iconBW vs FLS Comparison
Open Charts BW vs FLSBanner chart's image
Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises
Price$2.88
Change+$0.11 (+3.97%)
Volume$2.25M
Capitalization291.16M
Flowserve
Price$54.05
Change+$0.39 (+0.73%)
Volume$1.82M
Capitalization7.07B
BW vs FLS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BW vs. FLS commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BW is a Hold and FLS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (BW: $2.88 vs. FLS: $54.05)
Brand notoriety: BW and FLS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BW: 88% vs. FLS: 80%
Market capitalization -- BW: $291.16M vs. FLS: $7.07B
BW [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $291.16M. FLS’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $7.07B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $208.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $13.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BW and FLS are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLS is a better buy in the short-term than BW.

Price Growth

BW (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а -11.93% price change this week, while FLS (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -4.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.14%.

Reported Earning Dates

BW is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

FLS is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (-0.10% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLS($7.07B) has a higher market cap than BW($291M). BW YTD gains are higher at: 75.610 vs. FLS (-4.884). BW has less debt than FLS: BW (517M) vs FLS (1.67B).
BWFLSBW / FLS
Capitalization291M7.07B4%
EBITDA14.3MN/A-
Gain YTD75.610-4.884-1,548%
P/E RatioN/A24.46-
Revenue725MN/A-
Total Cash21.7MN/A-
Total Debt517M1.67B31%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BW vs FLS: Fundamental Ratings
BW
FLS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8784
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
53
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9541
SMR RATING
1..100
10057
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3454
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1358
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLS's Valuation (53) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BW (92) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BW’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BW (95) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BW’s over the last 12 months.

FLS's SMR Rating (57) in the Industrial Machinery industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BW (100) in the Electrical Products industry. This means that FLS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BW’s over the last 12 months.

BW's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Electrical Products industry is in the same range as FLS (54) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that BW’s stock grew similarly to FLS’s over the last 12 months.

BW's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the Electrical Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLS (58) in the Industrial Machinery industry. This means that BW’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFLS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FLS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUGT147.676.07
+4.29%
Direxion Daily Gold Miners Bull 2X ETF
RSDE21.460.16
+0.76%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Eql Wght Buffr ETF - Dec
TOK133.910.81
+0.61%
iShares MSCI Kokusai ETF
DECP29.260.12
+0.40%
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Dec
XRLX46.180.14
+0.30%
FundX Conservative ETF

BW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BW has been loosely correlated with SKUYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BW jumps, then SKUYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BW
1D Price
Change %
BW100%
+3.97%
SKUYF - BW
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ITT - BW
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.92%
CMI - BW
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
FLS - BW
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.12%
TKR - BW
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.82%
More

FLS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLS has been closely correlated with ITT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FLS jumps, then ITT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLS
1D Price
Change %
FLS100%
+1.12%
ITT - FLS
80%
Closely correlated
+0.92%
PH - FLS
79%
Closely correlated
+0.76%
DOV - FLS
78%
Closely correlated
+1.45%
GTLS - FLS
76%
Closely correlated
+0.10%
EMR - FLS
74%
Closely correlated
-1.16%
More