Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BVSIX vs RMFCX
BVSIX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts BVSIX vs RMFCX
Baywood Socially Responsible Instl
Price$17.62
Change+$0.05 (+0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.8M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$59.46
Change+$0.39 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets109.01B
BVSIX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BVSIX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVSIX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 109B vs. BVSIX (23.8M). BVSIX (1.33) and RMFCX (1.27) have matching dividends . BVSIX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: BVSIX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). BVSIX (3.03) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). RMFCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. BVSIX (23.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than BVSIX: RMFCX (250) vs BVSIX (5000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.47 vs. BVSIX (8.59). BVSIX return over 5 years is better than : 98.19 vs. RMFCX (61.83).
| BVSIX | RMFCX | BVSIX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.91 | 98% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 3.03 | 0.91 | 333% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.324 | 9.596 | 55% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000 | 250 | 2,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8M | 109B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.33 | 1.27 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.59 | 11.47 | 75% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.34 | 29.27 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.19 | 61.83 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.11 | 79.21 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement