BVSFF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
775.06M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TMVWF
Price
$6.77
Change
+$0.26 (+3.99%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
Capitalization
1.09B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BVSFF vs TMVWF

Header iconBVSFF vs TMVWF Comparison
Open Charts BVSFF vs TMVWFBanner chart's image
Bravura Solutions
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$250
Capitalization775.06M
TeamViewer SE
Price$6.77
Change+$0.26 (+3.99%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization1.09B
BVSFF vs TMVWF Comparison Chart in %
TMVWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVSFF vs. TMVWF commentary
Dec 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVSFF is a Buy and TMVWF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BVSFF: $2.09 vs. TMVWF: $6.77)
Brand notoriety: BVSFF and TMVWF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVSFF: 100% vs. TMVWF: 195%
Market capitalization -- BVSFF: $775.06M vs. TMVWF: $1.09B
BVSFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $775.06M. TMVWF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $1.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $285.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVSFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTMVWF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BVSFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TMVWF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BVSFF is a better buy in the long-term than TMVWF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

TMVWF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • TMVWF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BVSFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TMVWF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +52.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-0.90% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMVWF($1.09B) has a higher market cap than BVSFF($775M). BVSFF has higher P/E ratio than TMVWF: BVSFF (18.79) vs TMVWF (7.86). BVSFF YTD gains are higher at: 47.183 vs. TMVWF (-35.968). TMVWF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 250M vs. BVSFF (108M). BVSFF has more cash in the bank: 58.7M vs. TMVWF (37.3M). BVSFF has less debt than TMVWF: BVSFF (13.3M) vs TMVWF (1.03B). TMVWF has higher revenues than BVSFF: TMVWF (731M) vs BVSFF (256M).
BVSFFTMVWFBVSFF / TMVWF
Capitalization775M1.09B71%
EBITDA108M250M43%
Gain YTD47.183-35.968-131%
P/E Ratio18.797.86239%
Revenue256M731M35%
Total Cash58.7M37.3M157%
Total Debt13.3M1.03B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TMVWF: Fundamental Ratings
TMVWF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
65
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
92
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVSFFTMVWF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
TMVWF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSMUX16.040.05
+0.31%
Nuveen Quant Small/Mid Cap Eq W
PJFOX69.450.13
+0.19%
PGIM Jennison Growth R2
MSTVX10.990.02
+0.18%
Morningstar Alternatives
WIMVX11.75N/A
N/A
Segall Bryant & Hamill Glb All Cp Inst
FNGDX16.12N/A
N/A
Franklin Intl Growth C

BVSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BVSFF and TGCB have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BVSFF and TGCB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVSFF
1D Price
Change %
BVSFF100%
N/A
TGCB - BVSFF
6%
Poorly correlated
-22.73%
IDAI - BVSFF
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
SMTEF - BVSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TMVWF - BVSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MDPEF - BVSFF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

TMVWF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMVWF has been loosely correlated with PAYC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMVWF jumps, then PAYC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TMVWF
1D Price
Change %
TMVWF100%
N/A
PAYC - TMVWF
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
LCHTF - TMVWF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CCRD - TMVWF
34%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ZS - TMVWF
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.12%
ASAN - TMVWF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
More