BVSFF
Price
$0.86
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
PAYS
Price
$3.35
Change
-$0.19 (-5.37%)
Updated
Nov 15, 03:29 PM (EDT)
130 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BVSFF vs PAYS

Header iconBVSFF vs PAYS Comparison
Open Charts BVSFF vs PAYSBanner chart's image
Bravura Solutions
Price$0.86
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$40K
CapitalizationN/A
Paysign
Price$3.35
Change-$0.19 (-5.37%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
BVSFF vs PAYS Comparison Chart
Loading...
PAYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVSFF vs. PAYS commentary
Nov 15, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVSFF is a Hold and PAYS is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 15, 2024
Stock price -- (BVSFF: $0.86 vs. PAYS: $3.54)
Brand notoriety: BVSFF and PAYS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVSFF: 100% vs. PAYS: 74%
Market capitalization -- BVSFF: $149.31M vs. PAYS: $193.86M
BVSFF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $149.31M. PAYS’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $193.86M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVSFF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BVSFF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BVSFF is a better buy in the long-term than PAYS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PAYS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PAYS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BVSFF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAYS (@Packaged Software) price change was -10.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAYS is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.65% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAYS($194M) has a higher market cap than BVSFF($149M). PAYS has higher P/E ratio than BVSFF: PAYS (34.25) vs BVSFF (6.75). BVSFF YTD gains are higher at: 95.455 vs. PAYS (26.429). PAYS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.86M vs. BVSFF (-151.86M). BVSFF has more cash in the bank: 48.7M vs. PAYS (17M). PAYS has less debt than BVSFF: PAYS (3.31M) vs BVSFF (30.6M). BVSFF has higher revenues than PAYS: BVSFF (251M) vs PAYS (47.3M).
BVSFFPAYSBVSFF / PAYS
Capitalization149M194M77%
EBITDA-151.86M3.86M-3,935%
Gain YTD95.45526.429361%
P/E Ratio6.7534.2520%
Revenue251M47.3M531%
Total Cash48.7M17M286%
Total Debt30.6M3.31M924%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PAYS: Fundamental Ratings
PAYS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
72
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
31
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PAYS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
0%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
PAYS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BVSFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVSFF has been loosely correlated with NCNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVSFF jumps, then NCNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVSFF
1D Price
Change %
BVSFF100%
N/A
NCNO - BVSFF
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
XTKG - BVSFF
37%
Loosely correlated
-12.24%
PAYS - BVSFF
26%
Poorly correlated
-3.80%
SCWX - BVSFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TGCB - BVSFF
11%
Poorly correlated
+16.41%
More

PAYS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYS has been loosely correlated with ONTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYS jumps, then ONTF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAYS
1D Price
Change %
PAYS100%
-3.80%
ONTF - PAYS
41%
Loosely correlated
-2.86%
BIGC - PAYS
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.44%
SSTI - PAYS
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.95%
ALRM - PAYS
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.67%
EGHT - PAYS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.35%
More