BVRDF
Price
$31.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 20 closing price
Capitalization
13.65B
CPBLF
Price
$10.95
Change
-$1.07 (-8.90%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
6.22B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BVRDF vs CPBLF

Header iconBVRDF vs CPBLF Comparison
Open Charts BVRDF vs CPBLFBanner chart's image
BUREAU VERITAS SA
Price$31.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$783
Capitalization13.65B
ALS
Price$10.95
Change-$1.07 (-8.90%)
Volume$3.57K
Capitalization6.22B
BVRDF vs CPBLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BVRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVRDF vs. CPBLF commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVRDF is a Hold and CPBLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BVRDF: $31.94 vs. CPBLF: $10.95)
Brand notoriety: BVRDF and CPBLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Data Processing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVRDF: 203% vs. CPBLF: 70%
Market capitalization -- BVRDF: $13.65B vs. CPBLF: $6.22B
BVRDF [@Data Processing Services] is valued at $13.65B. CPBLF’s [@Data Processing Services] market capitalization is $6.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Data Processing Services] industry ranges from $48.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Data Processing Services] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVRDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCPBLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BVRDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CPBLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BVRDF and CPBLF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVRDF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPBLF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BVRDF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CPBLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BVRDF is a better buy in the short-term than CPBLF.

Price Growth

BVRDF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CPBLF (@Data Processing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was +3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +36.36%, and the average quarterly price growth was +37.60%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Data Processing Services (+3.95% weekly)

The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BVRDF($13.7B) has a higher market cap than CPBLF($6.22B). CPBLF has higher P/E ratio than BVRDF: CPBLF (31.87) vs BVRDF (18.89). CPBLF YTD gains are higher at: 14.241 vs. BVRDF (4.039). BVRDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.35B vs. CPBLF (675M). BVRDF has more cash in the bank: 875M vs. CPBLF (268M). CPBLF has less debt than BVRDF: CPBLF (2.09B) vs BVRDF (2.59B). BVRDF has higher revenues than CPBLF: BVRDF (6.41B) vs CPBLF (3B).
BVRDFCPBLFBVRDF / CPBLF
Capitalization13.7B6.22B220%
EBITDA1.35B675M200%
Gain YTD4.03914.24128%
P/E Ratio18.8931.8759%
Revenue6.41B3B214%
Total Cash875M268M326%
Total Debt2.59B2.09B124%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVRDF vs CPBLF: Fundamental Ratings
BVRDF
CPBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5932
SMR RATING
1..100
2866
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5852
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
79100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BVRDF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CPBLF (11). This means that BVRDF’s stock grew similarly to CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CPBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as BVRDF (59). This means that CPBLF’s stock grew similarly to BVRDF’s over the last 12 months.

BVRDF's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPBLF (66). This means that BVRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CPBLF's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as BVRDF (58). This means that CPBLF’s stock grew similarly to BVRDF’s over the last 12 months.

BVRDF's P/E Growth Rating (79) in the null industry is in the same range as CPBLF (100). This means that BVRDF’s stock grew similarly to CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVRDFCPBLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
44%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
28%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
25%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BVRDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CPBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
UNIT6.440.19
+3.04%
Uniti Group Inc
MASI147.194.18
+2.92%
Masimo Corp
AIRG4.370.12
+2.82%
Airgain
CHSCP28.930.15
+0.52%
CHS
SRTA4.06-0.12
-2.87%
Strata Critical Medical Inc

BVRDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BVRDF and BMBLF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BVRDF and BMBLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVRDF
1D Price
Change %
BVRDF100%
N/A
BMBLF - BVRDF
12%
Poorly correlated
+1.69%
CBMJ - BVRDF
11%
Poorly correlated
+17.65%
ASAZY - BVRDF
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.77%
CRWE - BVRDF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
COGNY - BVRDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+3.64%
More

CPBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPBLF has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPBLF jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPBLF
1D Price
Change %
CPBLF100%
N/A
MRLWF - CPBLF
51%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BSEFY - CPBLF
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DIGTF - CPBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DAO - CPBLF
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.43%
BVRDF - CPBLF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More