Advertisement
BVRDF vs CPBLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVRDF is a Hold and CPBLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BVRDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCPBLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BVRDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- CPBLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BVRDF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CPBLF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BVRDF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- CPBLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BVRDF (@Data Processing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CPBLF (@Data Processing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Data Processing Services industry was -1.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Data Processing Services (-1.50% weekly)The industry involves capturing raw data from various sources, extracting meaningful information from it and presenting it in a more accessible digital format. Many people would agree that data is the new gold, which makes data processing services all the more relevant for businesses’ strategic decisions. PayPal Holdings Inc., Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. and Automatic Data Processing, Inc. some of the big players in his burgeoning industry.
| BVRDF | CPBLF | BVRDF / CPBLF | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 6.21B | 224% |
| EBITDA | 1.35B | 675M | 200% |
| Gain YTD | 4.039 | 14.241 | 28% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.81 | 31.84 | 59% |
| Revenue | 6.41B | 3B | 214% |
| Total Cash | 875M | 268M | 326% |
| Total Debt | 2.59B | 2.09B | 124% |
BVRDF | CPBLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 96 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 7 Undervalued | 11 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 52 | 32 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | 65 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BVRDF's Valuation (7) in the null industry is in the same range as CPBLF (11). This means that BVRDF’s stock grew similarly to CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.
CPBLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the null industry is in the same range as BVRDF (52). This means that CPBLF’s stock grew similarly to BVRDF’s over the last 12 months.
BVRDF's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPBLF (65). This means that BVRDF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.
CPBLF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as BVRDF (59). This means that CPBLF’s stock grew similarly to BVRDF’s over the last 12 months.
BVRDF's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as CPBLF (100). This means that BVRDF’s stock grew similarly to CPBLF’s over the last 12 months.
| BVRDF | CPBLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 36% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 52% | 3 days ago 31% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 26% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 37% | 3 days ago 27% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 29% | 3 days ago 33% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 28% | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MRNY | 1.98 | 0.05 | +2.59% |
| YieldMax MRNA Option Income Strategy ETF | |||
| GMOI | 31.07 | 0.21 | +0.68% |
| GMO International Value ETF | |||
| FYLD | 30.87 | 0.16 | +0.52% |
| Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF | |||
| IBDT | 25.42 | -0.01 | -0.04% |
| iShares iBonds Dec 2028 Term Corp ETF | |||
| IBOT | 47.32 | -0.41 | -0.86% |
| VanEck Robotics ETF | |||
BVRDF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BVRDF and BMBLF have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BVRDF and BMBLF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BVRDF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BVRDF | 100% | N/A | ||
| BMBLF - BVRDF | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBMJ - BVRDF | 11% Poorly correlated | +28.13% | ||
| ASAZY - BVRDF | 10% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CRWE - BVRDF | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| COGNY - BVRDF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.60% | ||
More | ||||
CPBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPBLF has been loosely correlated with MRLWF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPBLF jumps, then MRLWF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CPBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPBLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRLWF - CPBLF | 51% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| BSEFY - CPBLF | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| DIGTF - CPBLF | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| DAO - CPBLF | 31% Poorly correlated | +2.97% | ||
| BVRDF - CPBLF | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||