BVLDF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.02 (-66.67%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.37M
MLXEF
Price
$0.36
Change
+$0.01 (+2.78%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
181.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BVLDF vs MLXEF

Header iconBVLDF vs MLXEF Comparison
Open Charts BVLDF vs MLXEFBanner chart's image
Bold Ventures
Price$0.01
Change-$0.02 (-66.67%)
Volume$10.42K
Capitalization1.37M
Metals X
Price$0.36
Change+$0.01 (+2.78%)
Volume$22.8K
Capitalization181.28M
BVLDF vs MLXEF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
MLXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVLDF vs. MLXEF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVLDF is a Hold and MLXEF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BVLDF: $0.01 vs. MLXEF: $0.37)
Brand notoriety: BVLDF and MLXEF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVLDF: 100% vs. MLXEF: 23%
Market capitalization -- BVLDF: $1.37M vs. MLXEF: $181.28M
BVLDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.37M. MLXEF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $181.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.1B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVLDF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMLXEF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BVLDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MLXEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MLXEF is a better buy in the long-term than BVLDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MLXEF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • MLXEF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BVLDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while MLXEF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -2.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.03%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.13% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MLXEF($181M) has a higher market cap than BVLDF($1.37M). MLXEF YTD gains are higher at: 32.074 vs. BVLDF (-58.333). MLXEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 61.3M vs. BVLDF (-292.17K). MLXEF has more cash in the bank: 14.1M vs. BVLDF (103K). BVLDF has less debt than MLXEF: BVLDF (10K) vs MLXEF (35.6M). MLXEF has higher revenues than BVLDF: MLXEF (151M) vs BVLDF (0).
BVLDFMLXEFBVLDF / MLXEF
Capitalization1.37M181M1%
EBITDA-292.17K61.3M-0%
Gain YTD-58.33332.074-182%
P/E RatioN/A1.62-
Revenue0151M-
Total Cash103K14.1M1%
Total Debt10K35.6M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVLDF vs MLXEF: Fundamental Ratings
BVLDF
MLXEF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10052
SMR RATING
1..100
9314
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8644
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
97100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MLXEF's Valuation (48) in the null industry is in the same range as BVLDF (76). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew similarly to BVLDF’s over the last 12 months.

MLXEF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BVLDF (100). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BVLDF’s over the last 12 months.

MLXEF's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BVLDF (93). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew significantly faster than BVLDF’s over the last 12 months.

MLXEF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BVLDF (86). This means that MLXEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BVLDF’s over the last 12 months.

BVLDF's P/E Growth Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as MLXEF (100). This means that BVLDF’s stock grew similarly to MLXEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVLDFMLXEF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MLXEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WEST6.410.26
+4.23%
Westrock Coffee Company
CC12.930.20
+1.57%
Chemours Company (The)
CSGP82.120.70
+0.86%
CoStar Group
EPRX5.39N/A
-0.02%
Eupraxia Pharmaceuticals
ATER1.55-0.04
-2.52%
Aterian

BVLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVLDF has been closely correlated with KGLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BVLDF jumps, then KGLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVLDF
1D Price
Change %
BVLDF100%
N/A
KGLLF - BVLDF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
AFBOF - BVLDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLXEF - BVLDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ULTHF - BVLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
UROY - BVLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%

MLXEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that MLXEF and ULTHF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that MLXEF and ULTHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MLXEF
1D Price
Change %
MLXEF100%
N/A
ULTHF - MLXEF
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.64%
BVLDF - MLXEF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PPZRF - MLXEF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CVWFF - MLXEF
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
MLGCF - MLXEF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More