BVLDF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 27 closing price
Capitalization
1.37M
KGLLF
Price
$0.06
Change
-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Updated
Feb 23 closing price
Capitalization
62.34M
Ad is loading...

BVLDF vs KGLLF

Header iconBVLDF vs KGLLF Comparison
Open Charts BVLDF vs KGLLFBanner chart's image
Bold Ventures
Price$0.03
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.37M
KGL Resources
Price$0.06
Change-$0.01 (-14.29%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization62.34M
BVLDF vs KGLLF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVLDF vs. KGLLF commentary
Jan 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVLDF is a Hold and KGLLF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BVLDF: $0.03 vs. KGLLF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: BVLDF and KGLLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVLDF: 100% vs. KGLLF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BVLDF: $1.37M vs. KGLLF: $62.34M
BVLDF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $1.37M. KGLLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $62.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVLDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKGLLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BVLDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KGLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BVLDF and KGLLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

BVLDF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KGLLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KGLLF($62.3M) has a higher market cap than BVLDF($1.37M). BVLDF (0.000) and KGLLF (0.000) have similar YTD gains . BVLDF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -292.17K vs. KGLLF (-1.61M). KGLLF has more cash in the bank: 12.9M vs. BVLDF (103K). BVLDF has less debt than KGLLF: BVLDF (10K) vs KGLLF (529K). KGLLF has higher revenues than BVLDF: KGLLF (231K) vs BVLDF (0).
BVLDFKGLLFBVLDF / KGLLF
Capitalization1.37M62.3M2%
EBITDA-292.17K-1.61M18%
Gain YTD0.0000.000-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0231K-
Total Cash103K12.9M1%
Total Debt10K529K2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVLDF: Fundamental Ratings
BVLDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
32
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
80
SMR RATING
1..100
94
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
71
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTC.X106146.2660004129.601600
+4.05%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY603.055.47
+0.92%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME27.47-0.04
-0.15%
GameStop Corp
TSLA424.07-2.43
-0.57%
Tesla
AAPL222.64-7.34
-3.19%
Apple

BVLDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVLDF has been closely correlated with KGLLF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BVLDF jumps, then KGLLF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVLDF
1D Price
Change %
BVLDF100%
N/A
KGLLF - BVLDF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
AFBOF - BVLDF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MLXEF - BVLDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ULTHF - BVLDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
UROY - BVLDF
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.02%

KGLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGLLF has been closely correlated with BVLDF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KGLLF jumps, then BVLDF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLLF
1D Price
Change %
KGLLF100%
N/A
BVLDF - KGLLF
76%
Closely correlated
N/A
MKRIF - KGLLF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
AUSDF - KGLLF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ULTHF - KGLLF
26%
Poorly correlated
-5.31%
METOF - KGLLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.86%
More