BVFL
Price
$18.47
Change
+$0.38 (+2.10%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
164.46M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
OCFC
Price
$19.43
Change
+$0.35 (+1.83%)
Updated
Dec 3 closing price
Capitalization
1.12B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BVFL vs OCFC

Header iconBVFL vs OCFC Comparison
Open Charts BVFL vs OCFCBanner chart's image
BV Financial
Price$18.47
Change+$0.38 (+2.10%)
Volume$21.03K
Capitalization164.46M
OceanFirst Financial
Price$19.43
Change+$0.35 (+1.83%)
Volume$267.22K
Capitalization1.12B
BVFL vs OCFC Comparison Chart in %
BVFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVFL vs. OCFC commentary
Dec 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVFL is a StrongBuy and OCFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BVFL: $18.18 vs. OCFC: $19.08)
Brand notoriety: BVFL and OCFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVFL: 24% vs. OCFC: 20%
Market capitalization -- BVFL: $164.46M vs. OCFC: $1.12B
BVFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $164.46M. OCFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileOCFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BVFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • OCFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, OCFC is a better buy in the long-term than BVFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OCFC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BVFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • OCFC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BVFL and OCFC are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BVFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.87% price change this week, while OCFC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

OCFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.92% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
OCFC($1.12B) has a higher market cap than BVFL($164M). BVFL has higher P/E ratio than OCFC: BVFL (17.42) vs OCFC (14.95). OCFC YTD gains are higher at: 10.404 vs. BVFL (5.575). BVFL has less debt than OCFC: BVFL (35M) vs OCFC (1.14B). OCFC has higher revenues than BVFL: OCFC (385M) vs BVFL (38.7M).
BVFLOCFCBVFL / OCFC
Capitalization164M1.12B15%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.57510.40454%
P/E Ratio17.4214.95117%
Revenue38.7M385M10%
Total Cash8.52MN/A-
Total Debt35M1.14B3%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVFL vs OCFC: Fundamental Ratings
BVFL
OCFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8961
SMR RATING
1..100
7221
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4552
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2221
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

OCFC's Valuation (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (83) in the null industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (89) in the null industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's SMR Rating (21) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BVFL (72) in the null industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as OCFC (52) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BVFL’s stock grew similarly to OCFC’s over the last 12 months.

OCFC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (22) in the null industry. This means that OCFC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVFLOCFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
36%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
68%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BVFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
OCFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GBERF784.63N/A
N/A
Geberit AG
IDKFF0.05N/A
N/A
ThreeD Capital Inc.
MZDAF7.25N/A
N/A
Mazda Motor Corp.
STGXF6.21N/A
N/A
Smartgroup Corp Ltd.
MHUBF0.71N/A
N/A
MINEHUB TECHNOLOGIES INC.

BVFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVFL has been loosely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVFL jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVFL
1D Price
Change %
BVFL100%
-0.71%
ASB - BVFL
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.66%
OCFC - BVFL
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
WAL - BVFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
CWBC - BVFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.04%
HWC - BVFL
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
More

OCFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OCFC has been closely correlated with HOPE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if OCFC jumps, then HOPE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To OCFC
1D Price
Change %
OCFC100%
+0.42%
HOPE - OCFC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.42%
DCOM - OCFC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.83%
UBSI - OCFC
83%
Closely correlated
-0.34%
FMBH - OCFC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
PGC - OCFC
82%
Closely correlated
+1.19%
More