BVFL
Price
$16.45
Change
-$0.09 (-0.54%)
Updated
Sep 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
163.31M
HWC
Price
$63.26
Change
+$0.24 (+0.38%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
5.36B
17 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BVFL vs HWC

Header iconBVFL vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts BVFL vs HWCBanner chart's image
BV Financial
Price$16.45
Change-$0.09 (-0.54%)
Volume$266
Capitalization163.31M
Hancock Whitney
Price$63.26
Change+$0.24 (+0.38%)
Volume$826.59K
Capitalization5.36B
BVFL vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVFL vs. HWC commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVFL is a Buy and HWC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BVFL: $16.43 vs. HWC: $63.26)
Brand notoriety: BVFL and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVFL: 50% vs. HWC: 111%
Market capitalization -- BVFL: $163.31M vs. HWC: $5.36B
BVFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $163.31M. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.36B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVFL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BVFL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than BVFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BVFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BVFL is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

BVFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.91% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.36B) has a higher market cap than BVFL($163M). BVFL has higher P/E ratio than HWC: BVFL (15.36) vs HWC (11.67). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 18.385 vs. BVFL (-4.472). HWC has more cash in the bank: 513M vs. BVFL (8.52M). BVFL has less debt than HWC: BVFL (35M) vs HWC (849M). HWC has higher revenues than BVFL: HWC (1.47B) vs BVFL (38.7M).
BVFLHWCBVFL / HWC
Capitalization163M5.36B3%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.47218.385-24%
P/E Ratio15.3611.67132%
Revenue38.7M1.47B3%
Total Cash8.52M513M2%
Total Debt35M849M4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVFL vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
BVFL
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9320
SMR RATING
1..100
7312
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3447
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BVFL (81) in the null industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BVFL (93) in the null industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew significantly faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BVFL (73) in the null industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (53) in the null industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as HWC (47) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BVFL’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVFLHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NAESX122.101.17
+0.97%
Vanguard Small Cap Index Inv
BHCFX18.000.16
+0.91%
Baron Health Care Retail
HFMIX28.080.25
+0.90%
Hartford MidCap I
LIDOX9.850.08
+0.82%
Lord Abbett International Value F3
GTDIX38.67N/A
N/A
Invesco Emerging Markets ex-China R5

BVFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVFL has been loosely correlated with WBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVFL jumps, then WBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVFL
1D Price
Change %
BVFL100%
-0.54%
WBS - BVFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
CWBC - BVFL
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.17%
WAL - BVFL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
UBFO - BVFL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
HWC - BVFL
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
+0.38%
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+1.09%
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
FULT - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
UCB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.60%
ONB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
More