BVFL
Price
$16.59
Change
-$0.13 (-0.78%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:58 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
166.19M
FUNC
Price
$37.65
Change
-$0.10 (-0.26%)
Updated
Sep 24, 04:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
245.17M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BVFL vs FUNC

Header iconBVFL vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts BVFL vs FUNCBanner chart's image
BV Financial
Price$16.59
Change-$0.13 (-0.78%)
Volume$100
Capitalization166.19M
First United
Price$37.65
Change-$0.10 (-0.26%)
Volume$100
Capitalization245.17M
BVFL vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVFL vs. FUNC commentary
Sep 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVFL is a Hold and FUNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BVFL: $16.72 vs. FUNC: $37.75)
Brand notoriety: BVFL and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVFL: 52% vs. FUNC: 74%
Market capitalization -- BVFL: $166.19M vs. FUNC: $245.17M
BVFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $166.19M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $245.17M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $166.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BVFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than BVFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVFL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BVFL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than BVFL.

Price Growth

BVFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.36% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($245M) has a higher market cap than BVFL($166M). BVFL has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: BVFL (15.63) vs FUNC (10.34). FUNC YTD gains are higher at: 14.359 vs. BVFL (-2.904). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. BVFL (8.52M). BVFL has less debt than FUNC: BVFL (35M) vs FUNC (151M). FUNC has higher revenues than BVFL: FUNC (83.7M) vs BVFL (38.7M).
BVFLFUNCBVFL / FUNC
Capitalization166M245M68%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.90414.359-20%
P/E Ratio15.6310.34151%
Revenue38.7M83.7M46%
Total Cash8.52M82.8M10%
Total Debt35M151M23%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVFL vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
BVFL
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8471
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
80
Overvalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9225
SMR RATING
1..100
7344
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5243
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3276
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (39) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BVFL (80) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BVFL (92) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew significantly faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (73) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BVFL (52) in the null industry. This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (76) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BVFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVFLFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USNZY0.910.04
+4.00%
Usinas Siderurgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.
HLPPY5.59N/A
N/A
Hang Lung Properties Ltd.
BWPC0.03N/A
N/A
Blue Water Petroleum Corp.
SCMWY72.01-0.26
-0.36%
Swisscom AG
RRTS2.11-0.05
-2.31%
Roadrunner Transportation Systems, Inc.

BVFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVFL has been loosely correlated with WBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVFL jumps, then WBS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVFL
1D Price
Change %
BVFL100%
+0.18%
WBS - BVFL
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
CWBC - BVFL
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.09%
WAL - BVFL
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
UBFO - BVFL
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.72%
FUNC - BVFL
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with SHBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then SHBI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.26%
SHBI - FUNC
71%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
FNB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
CWBC - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
UCB - FUNC
69%
Closely correlated
-1.26%
WTFC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
More