BVFL
Price
$15.85
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 7, 04:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
118.19M
FFMR
Price
$66.25
Change
+$0.25 (+0.38%)
Updated
Jul 2 closing price
Capitalization
440.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BVFL vs FFMR

Header iconBVFL vs FFMR Comparison
Open Charts BVFL vs FFMRBanner chart's image
BV Financial
Price$15.85
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization118.19M
First Farmers Financial
Price$66.25
Change+$0.25 (+0.38%)
Volume$350
Capitalization440.55M
BVFL vs FFMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVFL vs. FFMR commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVFL is a Hold and FFMR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BVFL: $15.85 vs. FFMR: $66.25)
Brand notoriety: BVFL and FFMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVFL: 43% vs. FFMR: 36%
Market capitalization -- BVFL: $118.19M vs. FFMR: $440.55M
BVFL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $118.19M. FFMR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $440.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFMR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BVFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFMR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BVFL and FFMR are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BVFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FFMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFMR is a better buy in the short-term than BVFL.

Price Growth

BVFL (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.55% price change this week, while FFMR (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.15% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.13% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMR($441M) has a higher market cap than BVFL($118M). FFMR has higher P/E ratio than BVFL: FFMR (10.41) vs BVFL (7.07). FFMR YTD gains are higher at: 0.453 vs. BVFL (-7.956). FFMR has more cash in the bank: 86.7M vs. BVFL (3.15M). BVFL has less debt than FFMR: BVFL (37.3M) vs FFMR (61.3M). FFMR has higher revenues than BVFL: FFMR (111M) vs BVFL (37.8M).
BVFLFFMRBVFL / FFMR
Capitalization118M441M27%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-7.9560.453-1,755%
P/E Ratio7.0710.4168%
Revenue37.8M111M34%
Total Cash3.15M86.7M4%
Total Debt37.3M61.3M61%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVFL vs FFMR: Fundamental Ratings
BVFL
FFMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9418
SMR RATING
1..100
6028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1430
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BVFL's Valuation (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMR (86). This means that BVFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BVFL (94). This means that FFMR’s stock grew significantly faster than BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's SMR Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BVFL (60). This means that FFMR’s stock grew similarly to BVFL’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (59). This means that BVFL’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

BVFL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (30). This means that BVFL’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVFLFFMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
28%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
27%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
66%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
20%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
18%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BVFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NWVCF0.290.02
+7.10%
EnWave Corp.
FAXXF17.24N/A
N/A
Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd.
MXGBF51.16N/A
N/A
Molson Coors CDA Inc.
PVARF10.57N/A
N/A
Porvair PLC
TOIPF1.00N/A
N/A
Thai Oil Public Co., Ltd.

BVFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVFL has been loosely correlated with WAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVFL jumps, then WAL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVFL
1D Price
Change %
BVFL100%
+0.57%
WAL - BVFL
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
HBAN - BVFL
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
WBS - BVFL
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.59%
FUNC - BVFL
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
EWBC - BVFL
55%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More

FFMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMR and BKUT have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMR and BKUT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMR
1D Price
Change %
FFMR100%
N/A
BKUT - FFMR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BVFL - FFMR
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
OPHC - FFMR
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
PEBK - FFMR
21%
Poorly correlated
+5.84%
SOMC - FFMR
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More