Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs TMFG
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TMFG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.51
Change-$0.34 (-0.83%)
Volume$371
Net Assets8.18M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$30.43
Change+$0.09 (+0.30%)
Volume$4.33K
Net Assets378.2M
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TMFG commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 378M vs. BUYZ (8.18M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: BUYZ (9.738) vs TMFG (7.421). BUYZ was incepted earlier than TMFG: BUYZ (6 years) vs TMFG (12 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). BUYZ has a higher turnover TMFG (15.00) vs TMFG (15.00).
| BUYZ | TMFG | BUYZ / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 9.738 | 7.421 | 131% |
| Net Assets | 8.18M | 378M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 15.00 | 253% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.35 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 72% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| LYFT - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | +0.32% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 72% Closely correlated | +0.66% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.73% | ||
| RTO - TMFG | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| MA - TMFG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
| AMZN - TMFG | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
More | ||||