Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs PCGG
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs PCGG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$43.29
Change-$0.65 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.69M
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$12.24
Change+$0.03 (+0.25%)
Volume$30.69K
Net Assets189.94M
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. PCGG commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and PCGG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCGG has more net assets: 190M vs. BUYZ (8.69M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than PCGG: BUYZ (19.044) vs PCGG (3.869). BUYZ was incepted earlier than PCGG: BUYZ (6 years) vs PCGG (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). BUYZ has a higher turnover PCGG (17.61) vs PCGG (17.61).
| BUYZ | PCGG | BUYZ / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | 19.044 | 3.869 | 492% |
| Net Assets | 8.69M | 190M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 17.61 | 216% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 89% | 6 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with FAST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then FAST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| FAST - BUYZ | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
| CPRT - BUYZ | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| V - BUYZ | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | +0.21% | ||
| V - PCGG | 22% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
| ABT - PCGG | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.18% | ||
| ACN - PCGG | 12% Poorly correlated | +2.76% | ||
| ZTS - PCGG | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.68% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.38% | ||
More | ||||