Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs PCGG
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs PCGG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.94
Change-$1.04 (-2.54%)
Volume$502
Net Assets7.99M
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$11.85
Change-$0.05 (-0.42%)
Volume$100
Net Assets188.54M
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. PCGG commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and PCGG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCGG has more net assets: 189M vs. BUYZ (7.99M). PCGG has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: PCGG (-0.543) vs BUYZ (-2.064). BUYZ was incepted earlier than PCGG: BUYZ (6 years) vs PCGG (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). BUYZ has a higher turnover PCGG (17.61) vs PCGG (17.61).
| BUYZ | PCGG | BUYZ / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | -2.064 | -0.543 | 380% |
| Net Assets | 7.99M | 189M | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 17.61 | 216% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -2.54% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.47% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 48% Loosely correlated | -4.05% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.62% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.99% | ||
| LYFT - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | -1.71% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | -0.83% | ||
| V - PCGG | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.39% | ||
| ABT - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.56% | ||
| ACN - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +4.24% | ||
| SHOP - PCGG | 13% Poorly correlated | -5.93% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.34% | ||
More | ||||