Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs PCGG
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs PCGG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.17
Change+$0.15 (+0.36%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets8.43M
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$12.17
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
Volume$31.65K
Net Assets185.68M
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. PCGG commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and PCGG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCGG has more net assets: 186M vs. BUYZ (8.43M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than PCGG: BUYZ (14.258) vs PCGG (3.314). BUYZ was incepted earlier than PCGG: BUYZ (5 years) vs PCGG (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). BUYZ has a higher turnover PCGG (17.61) vs PCGG (17.61).
| BUYZ | PCGG | BUYZ / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | 14.258 | 3.314 | 430% |
| Net Assets | 8.43M | 186M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 17.61 | 216% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 72% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 17 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CVNA - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.91% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that PCGG and V have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCGG and V's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | +0.04% | ||
| V - PCGG | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
| ABT - PCGG | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.91% | ||
| ACN - PCGG | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
| ZTS - PCGG | 10% Poorly correlated | +0.69% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.35% | ||
More | ||||