Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs GBUY
BUYZ vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs GBUY
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$41.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
Volume$397
Net Assets8.25M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$37.89
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
Volume$10.19K
Net Assets17.99M
BUYZ vs GBUY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. GBUY commentary
Jul 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and GBUY is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBUY has more net assets: 18M vs. BUYZ (8.25M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: BUYZ (11.820) vs GBUY (7.716). BUYZ was incepted earlier than GBUY: BUYZ (5 years) vs GBUY (4 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than GBUY (0.75). BUYZ has a higher turnover GBUY (31.00) vs GBUY (31.00).
| BUYZ | GBUY | BUYZ / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | 11.820 | 7.716 | 153% |
| Net Assets | 8.25M | 18M | 46% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.75 | 67% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 31.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 1.24 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 67% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 82% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| SE - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been closely correlated with MRVL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then MRVL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRVL - GBUY | 69% Closely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| HOOD - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | +2.86% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 63% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| META - GBUY | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| NFLX - GBUY | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.02% | ||
More | ||||