Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs GBUY
BUYZ vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs GBUY
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.11M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$37.47
Change+$0.05 (+0.13%)
Volume$11.52K
Net Assets17.99M
BUYZ vs GBUY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. GBUY commentary
Jul 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and GBUY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBUY has more net assets: 18M vs. BUYZ (8.11M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: BUYZ (9.829) vs GBUY (6.523). BUYZ was incepted earlier than GBUY: BUYZ (5 years) vs GBUY (4 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than GBUY (0.75). GBUY has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | GBUY | BUYZ / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | 9.829 | 6.523 | 151% |
| Net Assets | 8.11M | 18M | 45% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.75 | 67% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 31.00 | 41% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 1.24 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 73% | 5 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 5 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 82% | 5 days ago 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with SE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then SE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| SE - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| CVNA - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been closely correlated with MRVL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then MRVL could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | N/A | ||
| MRVL - GBUY | 69% Closely correlated | +1.25% | ||
| HOOD - GBUY | 65% Loosely correlated | -3.65% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| NFLX - GBUY | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
| META - GBUY | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||