Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.54
Change-$1.30 (-3.18%)
Volume$139
Net Assets7.95M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$102.52
Change-$3.94 (-3.70%)
Volume$140.69K
Net Assets1.31B
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.31B vs. BUYZ (7.95M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (34.445) vs BUYZ (10.652). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 10.652 | 34.445 | 31% |
| Net Assets | 7.95M | 1.31B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1,173% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 89% | 17 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -1.19% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.64% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 48% Loosely correlated | +5.69% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.63% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| LYFT - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.61% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -0.01% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | -3.17% | ||
| MTZ - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.53% | ||
More | ||||