Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.51
Change-$0.34 (-0.83%)
Volume$371
Net Assets8.18M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$106.55
Change+$0.21 (+0.20%)
Volume$52.9K
Net Assets1.32B
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.32B vs. BUYZ (8.18M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (34.558) vs BUYZ (9.738). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.738 | 34.558 | 28% |
| Net Assets | 8.18M | 1.32B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1,184% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 78% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 10 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 69% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.52% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 49% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.44% | ||
| LYFT - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.05% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.20% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | +0.27% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| MTZ - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.66% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
More | ||||