Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.17
Change+$0.15 (+0.36%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets8.43M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$93.34
Change-$0.16 (-0.17%)
Volume$40.84K
Net Assets935.99M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 936M vs. BUYZ (8.43M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (17.876) vs BUYZ (14.258). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 14.258 | 17.876 | 80% |
| Net Assets | 8.43M | 936M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1,016% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 10 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CVNA - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.91% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 83% Closely correlated | -1.15% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | -1.38% | ||
| NVDA - FWD | 81% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | +1.08% | ||
More | ||||