Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.15
Change+$0.68 (+1.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets7.7M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$85.08
Change+$1.63 (+1.95%)
Volume$500
Net Assets716.87M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jun 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 717M vs. BUYZ (7.7M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (5.379) vs BUYZ (4.223). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 4.223 | 5.379 | 79% |
| Net Assets | 7.7M | 717M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 163.00 | 8% |
| Yield | 0.07 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FWD | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with SE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then SE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -1.81% | ||
| SE - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.67% | ||
| CVNA - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.87% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -3.18% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | -2.23% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.84% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | -3.55% | ||
| ARM - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| SNPS - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -3.26% | ||
More | ||||