Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$41.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$478
Net Assets8.37M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$103.96
Change-$0.68 (-0.65%)
Volume$54.76K
Net Assets1.22B
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 1.22B vs. BUYZ (8.37M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (31.287) vs BUYZ (13.626). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 13.626 | 31.287 | 44% |
| Net Assets | 8.37M | 1.22B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.01 | 1,052% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 74% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 68% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.18% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| SPSC - BUYZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CSGP - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| GTM - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ETN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ETN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y