Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FBOT
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FBOT
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.54
Change+$0.42 (+1.05%)
Volume$419
Net Assets8.11M
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
Price$30.51
Change+$0.26 (+0.86%)
Volume$5.1K
Net Assets130.93M
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FBOT commentary
Jul 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FBOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBOT has more net assets: 131M vs. BUYZ (8.11M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than FBOT: BUYZ (9.829) vs FBOT (8.607). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FBOT: BUYZ (5 years) vs FBOT (5 years). BUYZ (0.50) and FBOT (0.50) have comparable expense ratios . FBOT has a higher turnover BUYZ (12.69) vs BUYZ (12.69).
| BUYZ | FBOT | BUYZ / FBOT | |
| Gain YTD | 9.829 | 8.607 | 114% |
| Net Assets | 8.11M | 131M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
| Turnover | 12.69 | 52.00 | 24% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.54 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 24 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with SE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then SE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.04% | ||
| SE - BUYZ | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.72% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.44% | ||
| CVNA - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.44% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
More | ||||
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| NVDA - FBOT | 76% Closely correlated | +1.33% | ||
| SNPS - FBOT | 75% Closely correlated | +4.90% | ||
| TER - FBOT | 72% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CAT - FBOT | 71% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| AMZN - FBOT | 69% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
More | ||||