Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FBOT
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FBOT
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$41.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
Volume$397
Net Assets8.25M
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
Price$31.59
Change+$0.05 (+0.16%)
Volume$18.26K
Net Assets135.42M
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FBOT commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FBOT is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBOT has more net assets: 135M vs. BUYZ (8.25M). FBOT has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FBOT (12.429) vs BUYZ (11.820). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FBOT: BUYZ (5 years) vs FBOT (5 years). BUYZ (0.50) and FBOT (0.50) have comparable expense ratios . FBOT has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FBOT | BUYZ / FBOT | |
| Gain YTD | 11.820 | 12.429 | 95% |
| Net Assets | 8.25M | 135M | 6% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 52.00 | 73% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.54 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 5 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 80% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 89% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 5 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 7 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| SE - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | +0.14% | ||
| NVDA - FBOT | 76% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| SNPS - FBOT | 74% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| CAT - FBOT | 72% Closely correlated | +0.98% | ||
| TER - FBOT | 70% Closely correlated | -1.29% | ||
| AMZN - FBOT | 69% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||