Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FBOT
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FBOT
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$41.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$478
Net Assets8.37M
Fidelity Disruptive Automation ETF
Price$32.78
Change-$0.08 (-0.24%)
Volume$14.18K
Net Assets157.3M
BUYZ vs FBOT Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FBOT commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FBOT is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBOT has more net assets: 157M vs. BUYZ (8.37M). FBOT has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FBOT (16.825) vs BUYZ (13.626). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FBOT: BUYZ (6 years) vs FBOT (6 years). BUYZ (0.50) and FBOT (0.50) have comparable expense ratios . BUYZ has a higher turnover FBOT (33.00) vs FBOT (33.00).
| BUYZ | FBOT | BUYZ / FBOT | |
| Gain YTD | 13.626 | 16.825 | 81% |
| Net Assets | 8.37M | 157M | 5% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.50 | 100% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 33.00 | 115% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.53 | 11% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FBOT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 89% | 13 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 79% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.01% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +4.18% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.77% | ||
| SPSC - BUYZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +1.75% | ||
| CSGP - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.48% | ||
| GTM - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.84% | ||
More | ||||
FBOT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBOT has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBOT jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBOT | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| NVDA - FBOT | 73% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| CAT - FBOT | 71% Closely correlated | -2.57% | ||
| AMZN - FBOT | 67% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| ST - FBOT | 66% Closely correlated | -1.79% | ||
| MSFT - FBOT | 65% Loosely correlated | +0.39% | ||
More | ||||