16 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FAST
BUYZ vs FAST Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FAST
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$43.29
Change-$0.65 (-1.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.69M
Fastenal
Price$48.70
Change+$0.85 (+1.78%)
Volume$4.94M
Capitalization55.89B
BUYZ vs FAST Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FAST commentary
Sep 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FAST is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FAST: Fundamental Ratings
FAST | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FAST | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 58% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 59% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 12 days ago 49% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 40% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with FAST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then FAST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| FAST - BUYZ | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.78% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 21% Poorly correlated | -1.93% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.64% | ||
| CPRT - BUYZ | 12% Poorly correlated | -0.04% | ||
| V - BUYZ | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.73% | ||
More | ||||
FAST and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FAST has been closely correlated with GWW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FAST jumps, then GWW could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FAST | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FAST | 100% | +1.78% | ||
| GWW - FAST | 79% Closely correlated | +0.84% | ||
| TRNS - FAST | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.23% | ||
| MSM - FAST | 17% Poorly correlated | +1.94% | ||
| WSO - FAST | 15% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
| AIT - FAST | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
More | ||||