Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs CGGO
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs CGGO
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.97
Change+$0.46 (+1.14%)
Volume$230
Net Assets8.18M
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Price$35.03
Change-$0.25 (-0.71%)
Volume$643.2K
Net Assets8.16B
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. CGGO commentary
Dec 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and CGGO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 8.16B vs. BUYZ (8.18M). CGGO has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: CGGO (21.027) vs BUYZ (10.997). BUYZ was incepted earlier than CGGO: BUYZ (6 years) vs CGGO (4 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BUYZ (0.50). BUYZ has a higher turnover CGGO (26.00) vs CGGO (26.00).
| BUYZ | CGGO | BUYZ / CGGO | |
| Gain YTD | 10.997 | 21.027 | 52% |
| Net Assets | 8.18M | 8.16B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.47 | 106% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 26.00 | 146% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 1.24 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 4 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| LIF - BUYZ | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.06% | ||
| LYFT - BUYZ | 15% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
More | ||||
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | -0.71% | ||
| BN - CGGO | 80% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 76% Closely correlated | +1.35% | ||
| NVDA - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| BX - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| TEL - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | +0.25% | ||
More | ||||