Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs CGGO
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs CGGO
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$41.27
Change+$0.13 (+0.32%)
Volume$397
Net Assets8.25M
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Price$32.69
Change+$0.25 (+0.77%)
Volume$780.26K
Net Assets6.61B
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. CGGO commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and CGGO is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 6.61B vs. BUYZ (8.25M). CGGO has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: CGGO (12.943) vs BUYZ (11.820). BUYZ was incepted earlier than CGGO: BUYZ (5 years) vs CGGO (3 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BUYZ (0.50). BUYZ has a higher turnover CGGO (31.00) vs CGGO (31.00).
| BUYZ | CGGO | BUYZ / CGGO | |
| Gain YTD | 11.820 | 12.943 | 91% |
| Net Assets | 8.25M | 6.61B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.47 | 106% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 31.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 1.35 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 11 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 17 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.33% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.36% | ||
| SE - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.31% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.71% | ||
More | ||||
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | +0.77% | ||
| BN - CGGO | 82% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| ASML - CGGO | 78% Closely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| IR - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| SAP - CGGO | 67% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 67% Closely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||