Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs CGGO
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs CGGO
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$42.17
Change+$0.15 (+0.36%)
Volume$1.03K
Net Assets8.43M
Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Price$32.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.06%)
Volume$2.49M
Net Assets6.77B
BUYZ vs CGGO Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. CGGO commentary
Aug 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and CGGO is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGGO has more net assets: 6.77B vs. BUYZ (8.43M). BUYZ (14.258) and CGGO (13.737) have matching annual dividend yield . BUYZ was incepted earlier than CGGO: BUYZ (5 years) vs CGGO (3 years). CGGO (0.47) has a lower expense ratio than BUYZ (0.50). BUYZ has a higher turnover CGGO (31.00) vs CGGO (31.00).
| BUYZ | CGGO | BUYZ / CGGO | |
| Gain YTD | 14.258 | 13.737 | 104% |
| Net Assets | 8.43M | 6.77B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.47 | 106% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 31.00 | 123% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 1.33 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 17 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| CVNA - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +4.91% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||
CGGO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CGGO has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CGGO jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGGO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGGO | 100% | +0.06% | ||
| BN - CGGO | 81% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
| TSM - CGGO | 76% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| NVDA - CGGO | 75% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| BX - CGGO | 73% Closely correlated | -1.75% | ||
| META - CGGO | 72% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
More | ||||