BUSE
Price
$24.38
Change
+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.16B
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HAFC
Price
$28.10
Change
-$0.15 (-0.53%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
841.74M
33 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs HAFC

Header iconBUSE vs HAFC Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs HAFCBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$24.38
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$261.74K
Capitalization2.16B
Hanmi Financial
Price$28.10
Change-$0.15 (-0.53%)
Volume$118.04K
Capitalization841.74M
BUSE vs HAFC Comparison Chart in %
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. HAFC commentary
Dec 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and HAFC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $24.38 vs. HAFC: $28.10)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and HAFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 61% vs. HAFC: 46%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.16B vs. HAFC: $841.74M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.16B. HAFC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $841.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $171.46B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.64B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAFC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAFC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAFC is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAFC’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HAFC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than HAFC.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.25% price change this week, while HAFC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.56%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

HAFC is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.01% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($2.16B) has a higher market cap than HAFC($842M). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than HAFC: BUSE (18.47) vs HAFC (11.71). HAFC YTD gains are higher at: 24.421 vs. BUSE (8.154). BUSE has more cash in the bank: 216M vs. HAFC (78.8M). HAFC has less debt than BUSE: HAFC (193M) vs BUSE (305M). BUSE has higher revenues than HAFC: BUSE (636M) vs HAFC (260M).
BUSEHAFCBUSE / HAFC
Capitalization2.16B842M256%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.15424.42133%
P/E Ratio18.4711.71158%
Revenue636M260M245%
Total Cash216M78.8M274%
Total Debt305M193M158%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs HAFC: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
HAFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
662
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5526
SMR RATING
1..100
1827
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5245
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1546
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
502

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAFC's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUSE (66). This means that HAFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (55). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (27). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

HAFC's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (52). This means that HAFC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HAFC (46). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to HAFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEHAFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HAFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSPFX6.650.03
+0.45%
US Global Investors Global Res
PSICX46.420.14
+0.30%
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index C
TCRAX53.410.10
+0.19%
American Century Growth A
MIQPX6.66-0.01
-0.15%
Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq R6
AIVEX20.17-0.04
-0.20%
American Funds International Vntg F-1

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+0.16%
TRMK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
WSFS - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
+0.11%
FMBH - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
EFSC - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
+0.18%
RNST - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
+0.42%
More

HAFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAFC has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HAFC jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAFC
1D Price
Change %
HAFC100%
-0.53%
TRMK - HAFC
78%
Closely correlated
-0.15%
PEBO - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
-0.26%
BUSE - HAFC
77%
Closely correlated
+0.16%
ABCB - HAFC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
HOPE - HAFC
75%
Closely correlated
+0.09%
More