BUSE
Price
$24.68
Change
-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
51 days until earnings call
FFBC
Price
$26.38
Change
-$0.32 (-1.20%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.5B
46 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs FFBC

Header iconBUSE vs FFBC Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs FFBCBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$24.68
Change-$0.09 (-0.36%)
Volume$373.56K
Capitalization2.2B
First Financial Ban
Price$26.38
Change-$0.32 (-1.20%)
Volume$316.24K
Capitalization2.5B
BUSE vs FFBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. FFBC commentary
Sep 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Buy and FFBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $24.68 vs. FFBC: $26.38)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and FFBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 75% vs. FFBC: 76%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.2B vs. FFBC: $2.5B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.2B. FFBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.75B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFBC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFBC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BUSE and FFBC are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFBC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FFBC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than FFBC.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.08% price change this week, while FFBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.09%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

FFBC is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.38% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBC($2.5B) has a higher market cap than BUSE($2.2B). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than FFBC: BUSE (19.59) vs FFBC (10.55). BUSE YTD gains are higher at: 8.304 vs. FFBC (0.953). FFBC has more cash in the bank: 210M vs. BUSE (191M). BUSE has less debt than FFBC: BUSE (306M) vs FFBC (1.03B).
BUSEFFBCBUSE / FFBC
Capitalization2.2B2.5B88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.3040.953871%
P/E Ratio19.5910.55186%
Revenue557MN/A-
Total Cash191M210M91%
Total Debt306M1.03B30%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs FFBC: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
FFBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1719
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4624
SMR RATING
1..100
1915
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4948
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1851
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4950

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBC's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (64). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (46). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (19). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

FFBC's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (49). This means that FFBC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBC (51). This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEFFBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BRSUX15.700.07
+0.45%
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R4
GAOTX21.980.06
+0.27%
JPMorgan Global Allocation R3
INTIX13.17N/A
N/A
Voya International Index Port S
BFIUX18.36N/A
N/A
Baron FinTech R6
TRLGX92.53-0.39
-0.42%
T. Rowe Price Lrg Cp Gr I

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FMBH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FMBH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-0.36%
FMBH - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-1.28%
TRMK - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
EFSC - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-0.83%
FFBC - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
FBK - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
More

FFBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBC has been closely correlated with EBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFBC jumps, then EBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBC
1D Price
Change %
FFBC100%
-1.20%
EBC - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.29%
TCBK - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-1.14%
UBSI - FFBC
91%
Closely correlated
-0.98%
FNB - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
-1.85%
BANR - FFBC
90%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More