BUSE
Price
$24.20
Change
+$0.50 (+2.11%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.14B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CFBK
Price
$27.01
Change
+$0.10 (+0.37%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
173.53M
26 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs CFBK

Header iconBUSE vs CFBK Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs CFBKBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$24.20
Change+$0.50 (+2.11%)
Volume$626.42K
Capitalization2.14B
CF Bankshares
Price$27.01
Change+$0.10 (+0.37%)
Volume$21.84K
Capitalization173.53M
BUSE vs CFBK Comparison Chart in %
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CFBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. CFBK commentary
Jan 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and CFBK is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2026
Stock price -- (BUSE: $24.20 vs. CFBK: $27.01)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CFBK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 143% vs. CFBK: 42%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.14B vs. CFBK: $173.53M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.14B. CFBK’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $173.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $157.7B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.79B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFBK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFBK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CFBK is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFBK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CFBK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than CFBK.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.04% price change this week, while CFBK (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2026.

CFBK is expected to report earnings on Feb 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.97% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($2.14B) has a higher market cap than CFBK($174M). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than CFBK: BUSE (18.33) vs CFBK (10.82). CFBK YTD gains are higher at: 8.257 vs. BUSE (1.723). CFBK has less debt than BUSE: CFBK (122M) vs BUSE (305M). BUSE has higher revenues than CFBK: BUSE (636M) vs CFBK (58M).
BUSECFBKBUSE / CFBK
Capitalization2.14B174M1,229%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.7238.25721%
P/E Ratio18.3310.82170%
Revenue636M58M1,097%
Total Cash216MN/A-
Total Debt305M122M250%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs CFBK: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
CFBK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7089
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
65
Fair valued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6140
SMR RATING
1..100
1855
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CFBK's Valuation (39) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFBK (55) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

CFBK's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (58) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CFBK’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CFBK (49) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than CFBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSECFBK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
51%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CFBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
LBSR0.070.01
+11.94%
Liberty Star Uranium & Metals Corp.
MRNFF1.400.03
+2.55%
Meren Energy Inc.
PTBS19.190.31
+1.64%
Potomac Bancshares, Inc.
OMRNF29.50N/A
N/A
OMRON Corp.
RYLPF29.50-0.70
-2.31%
Koninklijke Philips N.V

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with TRMK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then TRMK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+2.11%
TRMK - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
EFSC - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
+1.33%
WSFS - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
FMBH - BUSE
87%
Closely correlated
+2.72%
FRME - BUSE
86%
Closely correlated
+1.61%
More

CFBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFBK has been loosely correlated with FCCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CFBK jumps, then FCCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFBK
1D Price
Change %
CFBK100%
+0.37%
FCCO - CFBK
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
WBS - CFBK
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.23%
HNVR - CFBK
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
CARE - CFBK
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.86%
BUSE - CFBK
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
More