BUSE
Price
$24.25
Change
-$0.66 (-2.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
64 days until earnings call
CCBC
Price
$14.99
Change
+$0.54 (+3.74%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
13.04M
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs CCBC

Header iconBUSE vs CCBC Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs CCBCBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$24.25
Change-$0.66 (-2.65%)
Volume$376.43K
Capitalization1.33B
Chino Commercial Ban
Price$14.99
Change+$0.54 (+3.74%)
Volume$200
Capitalization13.04M
BUSE vs CCBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. CCBC commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and CCBC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $24.25 vs. CCBC: $14.99)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CCBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 118% vs. CCBC: 7%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. CCBC: $13.04M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. CCBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $13.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCCBC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CCBC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, CCBC is a better buy in the long-term than BUSE.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.14% price change this week, while CCBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.46% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.87% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($1.33B) has a higher market cap than CCBC($13M). CCBC YTD gains are higher at: 8.702 vs. BUSE (4.011). CCBC has less debt than BUSE: CCBC (3.09M) vs BUSE (336M). BUSE has higher revenues than CCBC: BUSE (442M) vs CCBC (5.07M).
BUSECCBCBUSE / CCBC
Capitalization1.33B13M10,223%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.0118.70246%
P/E Ratio10.79N/A-
Revenue442M5.07M8,723%
Total Cash142MN/A-
Total Debt336M3.09M10,863%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs CCBC: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
CCBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1435
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7022
SMR RATING
1..100
157
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5541
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3520
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CCBC (76) in the null industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to CCBC’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUSE (70) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's SMR Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as BUSE (15) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BUSE (55) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

CCBC's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as BUSE (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that CCBC’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSE
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL245.55-0.28
-0.11%
Apple
BTC.X96273.920000-303.835940
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY599.94-10.44
-1.71%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
GME26.42-0.62
-2.29%
GameStop Corp
TSLA337.80-16.60
-4.68%
Tesla

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 90% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-2.65%
FFBC - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
-1.64%
NWBI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
-0.63%
UBSI - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
THFF - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-3.31%
HFWA - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
More

CCBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CCBC and ESQ have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CCBC and ESQ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CCBC
1D Price
Change %
CCBC100%
+3.74%
ESQ - CCBC
29%
Poorly correlated
-3.58%
LKFN - CCBC
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
GSBX - CCBC
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LWCL - CCBC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BUSE - CCBC
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.65%
More