BURCA
Price
$25.16
Change
-$0.96 (-3.68%)
Updated
Nov 13 closing price
Capitalization
118.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
JSGCF
Price
Loading...
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Loading...
Capitalization
3.31B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BURCA vs JSGCF

Header iconBURCA vs JSGCF Comparison
Open Charts BURCA vs JSGCFBanner chart's image
Burnham Holdings
Price$25.16
Change-$0.96 (-3.68%)
Volume$324
Capitalization118.12M
LIXIL
PriceLoading...
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$100
Capitalization3.31B
BURCA vs JSGCF Comparison Chart in %
BURCA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BURCA vs. JSGCF commentary
Nov 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BURCA is a StrongBuy and JSGCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 14, 2025
Stock price -- (BURCA: $25.16 vs. JSGCF: $12.00)
Brand notoriety: BURCA and JSGCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Building Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BURCA: 23% vs. JSGCF: 100%
Market capitalization -- BURCA: $118.12M vs. JSGCF: $3.31B
BURCA [@Building Products] is valued at $118.12M. JSGCF’s [@Building Products] market capitalization is $3.31B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Building Products] industry ranges from $91.99B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Building Products] industry is $10.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BURCA’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileJSGCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BURCA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • JSGCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BURCA is a better buy in the long-term than JSGCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BURCA’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BURCA’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.

Price Growth

BURCA (@Building Products) experienced а -1.33% price change this week, while JSGCF (@Building Products) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Building Products industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Building Products (-1.79% weekly)

The industry manufactures products used in the construction of residential and commercial buildings. The process involves using materials and other products, and processing them to create finished items such as doors, windows, light fittings, floor coverings, climate control products and other building components and home improvement products. Masco Corporation, Allegion PLC and Lennox International Inc. are major manufacturers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JSGCF($3.31B) has a higher market cap than BURCA($118M). JSGCF has higher P/E ratio than BURCA: JSGCF (252.68) vs BURCA (11.76). BURCA YTD gains are higher at: 86.983 vs. JSGCF (16.505). JSGCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 107B vs. BURCA (23.2M). BURCA has less debt than JSGCF: BURCA (31.5M) vs JSGCF (659B). JSGCF has higher revenues than BURCA: JSGCF (1.49T) vs BURCA (270M).
BURCAJSGCFBURCA / JSGCF
Capitalization118M3.31B4%
EBITDA23.2M107B0%
Gain YTD86.98316.505527%
P/E Ratio11.76252.685%
Revenue270M1.49T0%
Total CashN/A115B-
Total Debt31.5M659B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BURCA vs JSGCF: Fundamental Ratings
BURCA
JSGCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8141
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
29
Undervalued
51
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8100
SMR RATING
1..100
67100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4353
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
832
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BURCA's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as JSGCF (51). This means that BURCA’s stock grew similarly to JSGCF’s over the last 12 months.

BURCA's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for JSGCF (100). This means that BURCA’s stock grew significantly faster than JSGCF’s over the last 12 months.

BURCA's SMR Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for JSGCF (100). This means that BURCA’s stock grew somewhat faster than JSGCF’s over the last 12 months.

BURCA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as JSGCF (53). This means that BURCA’s stock grew similarly to JSGCF’s over the last 12 months.

BURCA's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as JSGCF (32). This means that BURCA’s stock grew similarly to JSGCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BURCAJSGCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
34%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
25%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
19%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BURCA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SMEYX17.380.01
+0.06%
Invesco Small Cap Equity Y
ESCKX16.87N/A
N/A
1290 Essex Small Cap Growth R
FHCCX43.47N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Health Care C
LRSOX20.90-0.01
-0.05%
Lord Abbett Small Cap Value F3
JUECX26.64-0.03
-0.11%
JPMorgan US Equity C

BURCA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BURCA and CODYY have been poorly correlated (+14% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BURCA and CODYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BURCA
1D Price
Change %
BURCA100%
-3.68%
CODYY - BURCA
14%
Poorly correlated
+0.21%
DKILY - BURCA
13%
Poorly correlated
+0.92%
GBERY - BURCA
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.94%
DKILF - BURCA
8%
Poorly correlated
+2.87%
GBERF - BURCA
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

JSGCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that JSGCF and DKILY have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that JSGCF and DKILY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To JSGCF
1D Price
Change %
JSGCF100%
N/A
DKILY - JSGCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
GBERY - JSGCF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.60%
BURCA - JSGCF
5%
Poorly correlated
+4.83%
CODYY - JSGCF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.73%
GBERF - JSGCF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More