BUR
Price
$9.51
Change
+$0.14 (+1.49%)
Updated
Feb 4, 02:28 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.05B
90 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STCGF
Price
$13.85
Change
+$4.35 (+45.79%)
Updated
Feb 3 closing price
Capitalization
183.08M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUR vs STCGF

Header iconBUR vs STCGF Comparison
Open Charts BUR vs STCGFBanner chart's image
Burford Capital
Price$9.51
Change+$0.14 (+1.49%)
Volume$1.82K
Capitalization2.05B
STACK CAP GROUP
Price$13.85
Change+$4.35 (+45.79%)
Volume$8K
Capitalization183.08M
BUR vs STCGF Comparison Chart in %
BUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STCGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUR vs. STCGF commentary
Feb 05, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUR is a Hold and STCGF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2026
Stock price -- (BUR: $9.37 vs. STCGF: $13.85)
Brand notoriety: BUR and STCGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUR: 147% vs. STCGF: 255%
Market capitalization -- BUR: $2.05B vs. STCGF: $183.08M
BUR [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.05B. STCGF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $183.08M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $165.97B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTCGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BUR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STCGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUR is a better buy in the long-term than STCGF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STCGF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • STCGF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, STCGF is a better buy in the short-term than BUR.

Price Growth

BUR (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.49% price change this week, while STCGF (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.79%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.86%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUR is expected to report earnings on May 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.41% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUR($2.05B) has a higher market cap than STCGF($183M). BUR has higher P/E ratio than STCGF: BUR (23.43) vs STCGF (5.20). STCGF YTD gains are higher at: 23.904 vs. BUR (5.045). BUR has higher revenues than STCGF: BUR (267M) vs STCGF (6.55M).
BURSTCGFBUR / STCGF
Capitalization2.05B183M1,121%
EBITDAN/A34.1M-
Gain YTD5.04523.90421%
P/E Ratio23.435.20450%
Revenue267M6.55M4,079%
Total CashN/A31.1M-
Total Debt2.16BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUR: Fundamental Ratings
BUR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
75
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
97
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
37
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BURSTCGF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
38%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STCGF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MXCHY2.070.12
+6.15%
Orbia Advance Corp S A B
ABBNY87.510.58
+0.67%
ABB Ltd.
SFOSF2.66N/A
N/A
Shanghai Fosun Pharmaceutical Group Co Ltd
GDLNF0.10N/A
-2.96%
ENERGY TRANSITION MINERALS LTD.
AMYZF0.08-0.01
-9.75%
RECYCLICO BATTERY MATERIALS INC.

BUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUR has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUR jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUR
1D Price
Change %
BUR100%
-4.09%
BN - BUR
50%
Loosely correlated
-4.21%
CRBG - BUR
50%
Loosely correlated
-3.34%
JHG - BUR
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.27%
KKR - BUR
48%
Loosely correlated
-9.69%
CG - BUR
47%
Loosely correlated
-3.46%
More

STCGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that STCGF and BUR have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that STCGF and BUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STCGF
1D Price
Change %
STCGF100%
-5.59%
BUR - STCGF
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.09%
BCBNF - STCGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
ENDI - STCGF
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SHNWF - STCGF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AURE - STCGF
-0%
Poorly correlated
-3.98%
More