BUR
Price
$12.58
Change
-$0.28 (-2.18%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.49B
52 days until earnings call
SII
Price
$63.21
Change
-$0.16 (-0.25%)
Updated
Jun 13 closing price
Capitalization
964.89M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUR vs SII

Header iconBUR vs SII Comparison
Open Charts BUR vs SIIBanner chart's image
Burford Capital
Price$12.58
Change-$0.28 (-2.18%)
Volume$1.78M
Capitalization3.49B
Sprott
Price$63.21
Change-$0.16 (-0.25%)
Volume$138.47K
Capitalization964.89M
BUR vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUR vs. SII commentary
Jun 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUR is a Hold and SII is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BUR: $12.58 vs. SII: $63.21)
Brand notoriety: BUR and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUR: 158% vs. SII: 62%
Market capitalization -- BUR: $3.49B vs. SII: $964.89M
BUR [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.49B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.13B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the long-term than BUR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the short-term than BUR.

Price Growth

BUR (@Investment Managers) experienced а -5.63% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

SII is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.10% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUR($3.49B) has a higher market cap than SII($965M). SII has higher P/E ratio than BUR: SII (23.24) vs BUR (5.82). SII YTD gains are higher at: 51.715 vs. BUR (-0.863). SII has less debt than BUR: SII (24.2M) vs BUR (1.55B). BUR has higher revenues than SII: BUR (807M) vs SII (141M).
BURSIIBUR / SII
Capitalization3.49B965M362%
EBITDAN/A57.2M-
Gain YTD-0.86351.715-2%
P/E Ratio5.8223.2425%
Revenue807M141M572%
Total CashN/A22.9M-
Total Debt1.55B24.2M6,409%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUR vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
BUR
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
41
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1925
SMR RATING
1..100
9454
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7837
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1717
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a46

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SII's Valuation (41) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (44) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as SII (25) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUR (94) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUR’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUR (78) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SII’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUR’s over the last 12 months.

SII's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (17) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BURSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHYD22.48-0.03
-0.13%
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
LDUR95.36-0.14
-0.14%
PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF
COAL17.28-0.08
-0.47%
Range Global Coal ETF
JIRE69.68-0.87
-1.23%
JPMorgan International Rsrch Enh Eq ETF
PJFG98.79-1.32
-1.32%
PGIM Jennison Focused Growth ETF

BUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUR has been closely correlated with IVZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUR jumps, then IVZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUR
1D Price
Change %
BUR100%
-2.18%
IVZ - BUR
68%
Closely correlated
-2.81%
BN - BUR
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
AMG - BUR
62%
Loosely correlated
-1.12%
CG - BUR
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
CRBG - BUR
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.97%
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
-0.25%
BN - SII
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.30%
BUR - SII
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.18%
PX - SII
41%
Loosely correlated
-4.29%
IVZ - SII
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.81%
ARCC - SII
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.24%
More