BUR
Price
$13.33
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
60 days until earnings call
FNNCF
Price
$7.68
Change
+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
477.68M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUR vs FNNCF

Header iconBUR vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts BUR vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
Burford Capital
Price$13.33
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$898.98K
Capitalization2.92B
Financial 15 Split
Price$7.68
Change+$0.10 (+1.32%)
Volume$900
Capitalization477.68M
BUR vs FNNCF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUR vs. FNNCF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUR is a StrongBuy and FNNCF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BUR: $13.33 vs. FNNCF: $7.68)
Brand notoriety: BUR and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUR: 58% vs. FNNCF: 56%
Market capitalization -- BUR: $2.92B vs. FNNCF: $477.68M
BUR [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.92B. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $477.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUR is a better buy in the long-term than FNNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNNCF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNNCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNNCF is a better buy in the short-term than BUR.

Price Growth

BUR (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +3.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUR($2.92B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($478M). BUR has higher P/E ratio than FNNCF: BUR (11.73) vs FNNCF (3.27). FNNCF YTD gains are higher at: 19.626 vs. BUR (5.048).
BURFNNCFBUR / FNNCF
Capitalization2.92B478M610%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.04819.62626%
P/E Ratio11.733.27359%
Revenue411MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.79BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUR vs FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
BUR
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2076
SMR RATING
1..100
9595
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2630
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6641

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (30) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNNCF (76) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's SMR Rating (95) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FNNCF (95) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (55) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FNNCF (30) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BURFNNCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FNNCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRRRX21.710.20
+0.93%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Instl
JANVX88.280.31
+0.35%
Janus Henderson Venture D
FDYZX211.200.68
+0.32%
Franklin DynaTech Adv
FOBPX20.91-0.02
-0.10%
Tributary Balanced Instl Plus
EVUAX20.52-0.04
-0.19%
Allspring Util and Telecomms A

BUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUR has been loosely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUR jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUR
1D Price
Change %
BUR100%
+0.15%
EQH - BUR
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
AMG - BUR
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
JHG - BUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
AMP - BUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
BN - BUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and BUR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and BUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
+1.32%
BUR - FNNCF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBG - FNNCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.18%
WT - FNNCF
24%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
AIMFF - FNNCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.04%
More