BUR
Price
$13.86
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
3.49B
58 days until earnings call
FNNCF
Price
$5.65
Change
-$0.05 (-0.88%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
270.04M
Ad is loading...

BUR vs FNNCF

Header iconBUR vs FNNCF Comparison
Open Charts BUR vs FNNCFBanner chart's image
Burford Capital
Price$13.86
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$620.11K
Capitalization3.49B
Financial 15 Split
Price$5.65
Change-$0.05 (-0.88%)
Volume$2.7K
Capitalization270.04M
BUR vs FNNCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUR vs. FNNCF commentary
Apr 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUR is a Hold and FNNCF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BUR: $13.86 vs. FNNCF: $5.65)
Brand notoriety: BUR and FNNCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUR: 55% vs. FNNCF: 300%
Market capitalization -- BUR: $3.49B vs. FNNCF: $270.04M
BUR [@Investment Managers] is valued at $3.49B. FNNCF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $270.04M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFNNCF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FNNCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUR is a better buy in the long-term than FNNCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BUR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BUR (@Investment Managers) experienced а +13.51% price change this week, while FNNCF (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.90%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.63%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.90% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUR($3.49B) has a higher market cap than FNNCF($270M). BUR YTD gains are higher at: 8.706 vs. FNNCF (-11.994). BUR has higher revenues than FNNCF: BUR (807M) vs FNNCF (-2.58M).
BURFNNCFBUR / FNNCF
Capitalization3.49B270M1,293%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD8.706-11.994-73%
P/E Ratio5.82N/A-
Revenue807M-2.58M-31,280%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.55BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUR vs FNNCF: Fundamental Ratings
BUR
FNNCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
9492
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5172
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
395
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNNCF's Valuation (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUR (37) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUR’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (100) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

FNNCF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (94) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that FNNCF’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is in the same range as FNNCF (72) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew similarly to FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is significantly better than the same rating for FNNCF (95) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew significantly faster than FNNCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME26.780.53
+2.02%
GameStop Corp
AAPL196.982.71
+1.39%
Apple
BTC.X85063.414000612.609400
+0.73%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
SPY525.66N/A
N/A
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
TSLA241.37-0.18
-0.07%
Tesla

BUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUR has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUR jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUR
1D Price
Change %
BUR100%
+0.14%
BN - BUR
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
IVZ - BUR
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.27%
JHG - BUR
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
AMG - BUR
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
BLK - BUR
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.16%
More

FNNCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FNNCF and BUR have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FNNCF and BUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNNCF
1D Price
Change %
FNNCF100%
-0.88%
BUR - FNNCF
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
CYMBF - FNNCF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRBG - FNNCF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.50%
WT - FNNCF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
AIMFF - FNNCF
22%
Poorly correlated
-1.67%
More