BUR
Price
$13.33
Change
+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
2.92B
60 days until earnings call
CYMBF
Price
$61.36
Change
+$4.21 (+7.37%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
1.3B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUR vs CYMBF

Header iconBUR vs CYMBF Comparison
Open Charts BUR vs CYMBFBanner chart's image
Burford Capital
Price$13.33
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
Volume$898.98K
Capitalization2.92B
Cymbria
Price$61.36
Change+$4.21 (+7.37%)
Volume$200
Capitalization1.3B
BUR vs CYMBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUR vs. CYMBF commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUR is a StrongBuy and CYMBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BUR: $13.33 vs. CYMBF: $61.36)
Brand notoriety: BUR and CYMBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUR: 58% vs. CYMBF: 177%
Market capitalization -- BUR: $2.92B vs. CYMBF: $1.3B
BUR [@Investment Managers] is valued at $2.92B. CYMBF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.56B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCYMBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CYMBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUR is a better buy in the long-term than CYMBF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CYMBF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CYMBF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CYMBF is a better buy in the short-term than BUR.

Price Growth

BUR (@Investment Managers) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while CYMBF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +38.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUR($2.92B) has a higher market cap than CYMBF($1.3B). BUR has higher P/E ratio than CYMBF: BUR (11.73) vs CYMBF (7.54). CYMBF YTD gains are higher at: 17.728 vs. BUR (5.048). CYMBF has less debt than BUR: CYMBF (50M) vs BUR (1.79B). BUR has higher revenues than CYMBF: BUR (411M) vs CYMBF (280M).
BURCYMBFBUR / CYMBF
Capitalization2.92B1.3B225%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD5.04817.72828%
P/E Ratio11.737.54156%
Revenue411M280M147%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt1.79B50M3,588%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUR vs CYMBF: Fundamental Ratings
BUR
CYMBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
202
SMR RATING
1..100
9554
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5546
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2680
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6650

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUR's Valuation (30) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYMBF (70) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

CYMBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (20) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that CYMBF’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

CYMBF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUR (95) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that CYMBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUR’s over the last 12 months.

CYMBF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BUR (55) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry. This means that CYMBF’s stock grew similarly to BUR’s over the last 12 months.

BUR's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Agricultural Commodities Or Milling industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CYMBF (80) in the null industry. This means that BUR’s stock grew somewhat faster than CYMBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BURCYMBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
25%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
12%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
75%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CYMBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRRRX21.710.20
+0.93%
DWS RREEF Real Estate Securities Instl
JANVX88.280.31
+0.35%
Janus Henderson Venture D
FDYZX211.200.68
+0.32%
Franklin DynaTech Adv
FOBPX20.91-0.02
-0.10%
Tributary Balanced Instl Plus
EVUAX20.52-0.04
-0.19%
Allspring Util and Telecomms A

BUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUR has been loosely correlated with EQH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUR jumps, then EQH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUR
1D Price
Change %
BUR100%
+0.15%
EQH - BUR
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
AMG - BUR
53%
Loosely correlated
-1.19%
JHG - BUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
AMP - BUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-4.42%
BN - BUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
More

CYMBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CYMBF and IPZYF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CYMBF and IPZYF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CYMBF
1D Price
Change %
CYMBF100%
N/A
IPZYF - CYMBF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGGF - CYMBF
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FNNCF - CYMBF
30%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
BUR - CYMBF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.15%
CEVIY - CYMBF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More