The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
The average fundamental analysis ratings, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, are as follows
META | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 26 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BULZ | META | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 9 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 72% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FXZ | 65.69 | 1.56 | +2.43% |
| First Trust Materials AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| IQDF | 30.28 | 0.10 | +0.35% |
| FlexShares Intl Qual Div ETF | |||
| PBDE | 29.43 | 0.03 | +0.11% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Dec | |||
| BNDX | 49.22 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Vanguard Total International Bond ETF | |||
| FTBD | 49.86 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Fidelity Tactical Bond ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BULZ has been closely correlated with ADBE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BULZ jumps, then ADBE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BULZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BULZ | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| ADBE - BULZ | 80% Closely correlated | +2.13% | ||
| AMZN - BULZ | 77% Closely correlated | -0.65% | ||
| MU - BULZ | 76% Closely correlated | -1.99% | ||
| META - BULZ | 75% Closely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| AMD - BULZ | 74% Closely correlated | +0.00% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, META has been loosely correlated with DASH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if META jumps, then DASH could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To META | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| META | 100% | +0.40% | ||
| DASH - META | 58% Loosely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| RDDT - META | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.92% | ||
| THRY - META | 57% Loosely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| OPRA - META | 52% Loosely correlated | +4.15% | ||
| PINS - META | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.27% | ||
More | ||||