Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUL vs SCHM
BUL vs SCHM Comparison
Open Charts BUL vs SCHM
Pacer US Cash Cows Growth ETF
Price$54.38
Change+$0.05 (+0.09%)
Volume$2.03K
Net Assets103.24M
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
Price$30.25
Change+$0.17 (+0.57%)
Volume$628
Net Assets12.21B
BUL vs SCHM Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUL vs. SCHM commentary
Dec 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUL is a Buy and SCHM is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHM has more net assets: 12.2B vs. BUL (103M). BUL has a higher annual dividend yield than SCHM: BUL (17.334) vs SCHM (9.722). BUL was incepted earlier than SCHM: BUL (7 years) vs SCHM (15 years). SCHM (0.04) has a lower expense ratio than BUL (0.60). BUL has a higher turnover SCHM (13.00) vs SCHM (13.00).
| BUL | SCHM | BUL / SCHM | |
| Gain YTD | 17.334 | 9.722 | 178% |
| Net Assets | 103M | 12.2B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.04 | 1,500% |
| Turnover | 137.00 | 13.00 | 1,054% |
| Yield | 0.14 | 1.41 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUL | SCHM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 7 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 75% | 18 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUL has been closely correlated with FTV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUL jumps, then FTV could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
SCHM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHM has been loosely correlated with STLD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHM jumps, then STLD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | 100% | +0.87% | ||
| STLD - SCHM | 55% Loosely correlated | +2.31% | ||
| PTC - SCHM | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| DKNG - SCHM | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.80% | ||
| NTAP - SCHM | 42% Loosely correlated | -1.01% | ||
| WDC - SCHM | 41% Loosely correlated | -2.75% | ||
More | ||||