BUKS
Price
$1.54
Change
-$0.06 (-3.75%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
99.88M
CMGMY
Price
$7.15
Change
-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUKS vs CMGMY

Header iconBUKS vs CMGMY Comparison
Open Charts BUKS vs CMGMYBanner chart's image
Butler National
Price$1.54
Change-$0.06 (-3.75%)
Volume$181.98K
Capitalization99.88M
Chemring Group
Price$7.15
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Volume$6.69K
Capitalization1.96B
BUKS vs CMGMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BUKS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMGMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUKS vs. CMGMY commentary
Sep 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUKS is a Hold and CMGMY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 08, 2025
Stock price -- (BUKS: $1.54 vs. CMGMY: $7.15)
Brand notoriety: BUKS and CMGMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Aerospace & Defense industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUKS: 190% vs. CMGMY: 34%
Market capitalization -- BUKS: $99.88M vs. CMGMY: $1.96B
BUKS [@Aerospace & Defense] is valued at $99.88M. CMGMY’s [@Aerospace & Defense] market capitalization is $1.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry ranges from $296.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Aerospace & Defense] industry is $21.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUKS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCMGMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUKS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CMGMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUKS is a better buy in the long-term than CMGMY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUKS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CMGMY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUKS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CMGMY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUKS is a better buy in the short-term than CMGMY.

Price Growth

BUKS (@Aerospace & Defense) experienced а -5.23% price change this week, while CMGMY (@Aerospace & Defense) price change was -3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Aerospace & Defense industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was +41.34%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Aerospace & Defense (-0.14% weekly)

Aerospace & Defense is one of largest industries in the U.S., mainly comprising the following areas: commercial airliners, military aircraft, missiles, space, and general aviation. Focused heavily on research & development, it is also one of the fastest growing industries. Military aircraft has the largest market share in the industry’s sales, followed by space systems, civil aircraft, and missiles. Aerospace exports, directly and indirectly, support more jobs than the export of any other commodity, according to a study by the U.S. Department of Commerce. Boeing Company, Lockheed Martin Corporation and General Electric Company are some of the most prominent players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CMGMY($1.96B) has a higher market cap than BUKS($99.9M). CMGMY has higher P/E ratio than BUKS: CMGMY (28.76) vs BUKS (8.11). CMGMY YTD gains are higher at: 73.029 vs. BUKS (-16.757).
BUKSCMGMYBUKS / CMGMY
Capitalization99.9M1.96B5%
EBITDA25.6MN/A-
Gain YTD-16.75773.029-23%
P/E Ratio8.1128.7628%
Revenue84MN/A-
Total Cash25.2MN/A-
Total Debt39.2MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUKS vs CMGMY: Fundamental Ratings
BUKS
CMGMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2321
SMR RATING
1..100
4362
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5449
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2683
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CMGMY's Valuation (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUKS (55). This means that CMGMY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUKS’s over the last 12 months.

CMGMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is in the same range as BUKS (23). This means that CMGMY’s stock grew similarly to BUKS’s over the last 12 months.

BUKS's SMR Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as CMGMY (62). This means that BUKS’s stock grew similarly to CMGMY’s over the last 12 months.

CMGMY's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as BUKS (54). This means that CMGMY’s stock grew similarly to BUKS’s over the last 12 months.

BUKS's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CMGMY (83). This means that BUKS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CMGMY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUKSCMGMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 26 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BUKS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CMGMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RNGFX72.410.55
+0.77%
American Funds New Economy R5
MSOPX32.960.03
+0.09%
Morgan Stanley Inst Global Opp C
LFSFX30.010.01
+0.03%
Lord Abbett Focused Small Cap Value F
GVEZX19.53-0.07
-0.36%
GuideStone Funds Value Equity Investor
VMNFX13.95-0.14
-0.99%
Vanguard Market Neutral Inv

BUKS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUKS and ATROB have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUKS and ATROB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUKS
1D Price
Change %
BUKS100%
-3.75%
ATROB - BUKS
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AUTLF - BUKS
8%
Poorly correlated
+3.66%
CITAF - BUKS
8%
Poorly correlated
+8.15%
BDRAF - BUKS
3%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
CMGMY - BUKS
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
More

CMGMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CMGMY and BDRAF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CMGMY and BDRAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CMGMY
1D Price
Change %
CMGMY100%
-0.14%
BDRAF - CMGMY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.36%
BDRBF - CMGMY
8%
Poorly correlated
-0.45%
BAESY - CMGMY
3%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
BUKS - CMGMY
2%
Poorly correlated
-3.75%
AVNBF - CMGMY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More