Advertisement
BUHPF vs FSNUF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUHPF is a Hold and FSNUF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUHPF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSNUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BUHPF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FSNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FSNUF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FSNUF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BUHPF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSNUF (@Hospital/Nursing Management) price change was +5.21% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hospital/Nursing Management industry was +3.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +82.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was +76.28%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hospital/Nursing Management (+3.71% weekly)Hospital/Nursing Management companies own and operate health care facilities. Their operations include nursing homes, acute care facilities, retirement centers and outpatient surgery centers. HCA Healthcare Inc., Alcon Inc. and Universal Health Services, Inc. are some major companies in this industry. Technology has been at the forefront of development of advanced solutions, including quicker diagnoses of complex conditions. Investments in new diagnostics, healthcare IoT, and other healthcare technologies continue to gather momentum in this industry.
| BUHPF | FSNUF | BUHPF / FSNUF | |
| Capitalization | 4.33B | 30.4B | 14% |
| EBITDA | 10.1B | 3.16B | 319% |
| Gain YTD | -30.014 | 73.929 | -41% |
| P/E Ratio | 18.12 | 24.09 | 75% |
| Revenue | 25B | 22.3B | 112% |
| Total Cash | 12.4B | 1.39B | 891% |
| Total Debt | 131M | 12.9B | 1% |
BUHPF | FSNUF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 21 Undervalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 84 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 34 | 82 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FSNUF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as BUHPF (21). This means that FSNUF’s stock grew similarly to BUHPF’s over the last 12 months.
BUHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as FSNUF (84). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew similarly to FSNUF’s over the last 12 months.
BUHPF's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSNUF (82). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSNUF’s over the last 12 months.
FSNUF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUHPF (75). This means that FSNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUHPF’s over the last 12 months.
BUHPF's P/E Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as FSNUF (96). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew similarly to FSNUF’s over the last 12 months.
| BUHPF | FSNUF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 48% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 37% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 41% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 30% | 3 days ago 39% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 27% | 3 days ago 39% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 30% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| VSDB | 76.59 | 0.02 | +0.03% |
| Vanguard Short Duration Bond ETF | |||
| VABS | 24.32 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Virtus Newfleet ABS/MBS ETF | |||
| FPEI | 19.34 | -0.02 | -0.10% |
| First Trust Instl Pref Secs and Inc ETF | |||
| TEMP | 50.54 | -0.06 | -0.12% |
| JPMorgan Climate Change Solutions ETF | |||
| AWP | 3.90 | -0.01 | -0.26% |
| abrdn Global Premier Properties Fund | |||
BUHPF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BUHPF and FSNUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUHPF and FSNUF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUHPF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUHPF | 100% | N/A | ||
| FSNUF - BUHPF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| PIII - BUHPF | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.20% | ||
| AIRS - BUHPF | 2% Poorly correlated | +1.50% | ||
| NUMIF - BUHPF | 1% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
| PHCI - BUHPF | 0% Poorly correlated | +9.09% | ||
More | ||||
FSNUF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FSNUF and EXETF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSNUF and EXETF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FSNUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FSNUF | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXETF - FSNUF | 28% Poorly correlated | +6.11% | ||
| BUHPF - FSNUF | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| FSNUY - FSNUF | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.81% | ||
| FMCQF - FSNUF | 9% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CCEL - FSNUF | 5% Poorly correlated | -1.03% | ||
More | ||||