BUHPF
Price
$4.85
Change
+$0.10 (+2.11%)
Updated
Mar 18 closing price
Capitalization
5.01B
FSNUF
Price
$50.29
Change
+$12.56 (+33.29%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
17.71B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUHPF vs FSNUF

Header iconBUHPF vs FSNUF Comparison
Open Charts BUHPF vs FSNUFBanner chart's image
Bumrungrad Hospital Public
Price$4.85
Change+$0.10 (+2.11%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization5.01B
Fresenius SE & Co. KGaA
Price$50.29
Change+$12.56 (+33.29%)
Volume$2.25K
Capitalization17.71B
BUHPF vs FSNUF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FSNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUHPF vs. FSNUF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUHPF is a Hold and FSNUF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (BUHPF: $4.85 vs. FSNUF: $50.29)
Brand notoriety: BUHPF and FSNUF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical/Nursing Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUHPF: 100% vs. FSNUF: 132%
Market capitalization -- BUHPF: $5.01B vs. FSNUF: $17.71B
BUHPF [@Medical/Nursing Services] is valued at $5.01B. FSNUF’s [@Medical/Nursing Services] market capitalization is $17.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry ranges from $88.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical/Nursing Services] industry is $4.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUHPF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSNUF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUHPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSNUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSNUF is a better buy in the long-term than BUHPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FSNUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FSNUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BUHPF (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FSNUF (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was +2.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.10%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical/Nursing Services (+2.64% weekly)

The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNUF($17.7B) has a higher market cap than BUHPF($5.01B). BUHPF has higher P/E ratio than FSNUF: BUHPF (38.46) vs FSNUF (12.56). FSNUF YTD gains are higher at: 53.085 vs. BUHPF (-30.014). BUHPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.17B vs. FSNUF (6.38B). BUHPF has more cash in the bank: 9.85B vs. FSNUF (2.32B). BUHPF has less debt than FSNUF: BUHPF (58M) vs FSNUF (27.8B). FSNUF has higher revenues than BUHPF: FSNUF (41.3B) vs BUHPF (20.7B).
BUHPFFSNUFBUHPF / FSNUF
Capitalization5.01B17.7B28%
EBITDA7.17B6.38B112%
Gain YTD-30.01453.085-57%
P/E Ratio38.4612.56306%
Revenue20.7B41.3B50%
Total Cash9.85B2.32B424%
Total Debt58M27.8B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUHPF vs FSNUF: Fundamental Ratings
BUHPF
FSNUF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6183
SMR RATING
1..100
3587
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9293
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSNUF's Valuation (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BUHPF (88). This means that FSNUF’s stock grew significantly faster than BUHPF’s over the last 12 months.

BUHPF's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as FSNUF (83). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew similarly to FSNUF’s over the last 12 months.

BUHPF's SMR Rating (35) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSNUF (87). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSNUF’s over the last 12 months.

FSNUF's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BUHPF (80). This means that FSNUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BUHPF’s over the last 12 months.

BUHPF's P/E Growth Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as FSNUF (93). This means that BUHPF’s stock grew similarly to FSNUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUHPFFSNUF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
25%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FSNUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUKZ55.660.68
+1.24%
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
SHOC53.740.55
+1.03%
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
SIL49.090.38
+0.78%
Global X Silver Miners ETF
SCAP34.880.27
+0.77%
Infrastructure Capital Small Cap Inc ETF
SOXY52.440.29
+0.55%
YieldMax Target 12 Smcndctr Opt Inc ETF

BUHPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BUHPF and FSNUF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUHPF and FSNUF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUHPF
1D Price
Change %
BUHPF100%
N/A
FSNUF - BUHPF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PIII - BUHPF
10%
Poorly correlated
-4.63%
AIRS - BUHPF
2%
Poorly correlated
+4.65%
NUMIF - BUHPF
1%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
PHCI - BUHPF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSNUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FSNUF and EXETF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FSNUF and EXETF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSNUF
1D Price
Change %
FSNUF100%
N/A
EXETF - FSNUF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
BUHPF - FSNUF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSNUY - FSNUF
11%
Poorly correlated
-0.16%
FMCQF - FSNUF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCEL - FSNUF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
More