Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs XLK
BUG vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs XLK
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.52
Change-$0.90 (-2.69%)
Volume$779
Net Assets1.07B
The Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
Price$286.59
Change-$7.33 (-2.49%)
Volume$32.79K
Net Assets95.14B
BUG vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. XLK commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a StrongBuy and XLK is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 95.1B vs. BUG (1.07B). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: XLK (27.001) vs BUG (4.145). BUG was incepted earlier than XLK: BUG (6 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than BUG (0.51). XLK has a higher turnover BUG (23.91) vs BUG (23.91).
| BUG | XLK | BUG / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | 4.145 | 27.001 | 15% |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 95.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.08 | 638% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 39.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.50 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 17 days ago 88% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 84% | 7 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 83% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | +0.31% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 84% Closely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 80% Closely correlated | +1.41% | ||
| KLAC - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
| TRMB - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| APH - XLK | 76% Closely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||