Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs XLK
BUG vs XLK Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs XLK
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$26.96
Change-$0.25 (-0.92%)
Volume$2.66K
Net Assets876.48M
State Street®TechSelSectSPDR®ETF
Price$137.59
Change-$4.49 (-3.16%)
Volume$29.45K
Net Assets90.04B
BUG vs XLK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. XLK commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a Hold and XLK is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLK has more net assets: 90B vs. BUG (876M). XLK has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: XLK (-1.313) vs BUG (-10.670). BUG was incepted earlier than XLK: BUG (6 years) vs XLK (27 years). XLK (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than BUG (0.51). BUG has a higher turnover XLK (5.00) vs XLK (5.00).
| BUG | XLK | BUG / XLK | |
| Gain YTD | -10.670 | -1.313 | 813% |
| Net Assets | 876M | 90B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.08 | 638% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 5.00 | 478% |
| Yield | 0.04 | 0.54 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | XLK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 87% | 8 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | -5.09% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 83% Closely correlated | -6.26% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 81% Closely correlated | -3.90% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | -5.23% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
More | ||||
XLK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLK has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLK jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To XLK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | 100% | -2.19% | ||
| NVDA - XLK | 85% Closely correlated | -2.84% | ||
| TRMB - XLK | 79% Closely correlated | -4.80% | ||
| LRCX - XLK | 78% Closely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| MPWR - XLK | 77% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
| APH - XLK | 77% Closely correlated | +1.47% | ||
More | ||||