Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs SMH
BUG vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs SMH
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$31.15
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$298.98K
Net Assets980.6M
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$364.17
Change+$1.01 (+0.28%)
Volume$1.64M
Net Assets37.47B
BUG vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. SMH commentary
Dec 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a Hold and SMH is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 37.5B vs. BUG (981M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: SMH (50.378) vs BUG (-2.929). BUG was incepted earlier than SMH: BUG (6 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BUG (0.51). BUG has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| BUG | SMH | BUG / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -2.929 | 50.378 | -6% |
| Net Assets | 981M | 37.5B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.35 | 146% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 15.00 | 159% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.30 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | N/A | ||
| ZS - BUG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.36% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.64% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +0.65% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +0.21% | ||
More | ||||