Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs SMH
BUG vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs SMH
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$34.18
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
Volume$130.74K
Net Assets1.09B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$342.83
Change-$0.47 (-0.14%)
Volume$8.4M
Net Assets33.81B
BUG vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. SMH commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 33.8B vs. BUG (1.09B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: SMH (41.566) vs BUG (6.513). BUG was incepted earlier than SMH: BUG (6 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BUG (0.51). BUG has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| BUG | SMH | BUG / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 6.513 | 41.566 | 16% |
| Net Assets | 1.09B | 33.8B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.35 | 146% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 15.00 | 159% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.33 | 26% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 9 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | -0.03% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 83% Closely correlated | +0.34% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 81% Closely correlated | +0.50% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | +1.16% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.36% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | -0.14% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | -0.60% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.78% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | -1.20% | ||
More | ||||