Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs SMH
BUG vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs SMH
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$31.94
Change+$0.51 (+1.62%)
Volume$555.95K
Net Assets1.02B
VanEck Semiconductor ETF
Price$364.44
Change+$5.01 (+1.39%)
Volume$55.19K
Net Assets35.52B
BUG vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. SMH commentary
Dec 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 35.5B vs. BUG (1.02B). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: SMH (48.491) vs BUG (-1.958). BUG was incepted earlier than SMH: BUG (6 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than BUG (0.51). BUG has a higher turnover SMH (15.00) vs SMH (15.00).
| BUG | SMH | BUG / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | -1.958 | 48.491 | -4% |
| Net Assets | 1.02B | 35.5B | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.35 | 146% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 15.00 | 159% |
| Yield | 0.10 | 0.30 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 86% | 6 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 6 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 88% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 84% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 6 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 83% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 81% Closely correlated | +2.60% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | +1.12% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.93% | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | +1.38% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with KLAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then KLAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.88% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 87% Closely correlated | +2.82% | ||
| NVDA - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 85% Closely correlated | +1.54% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 82% Closely correlated | +2.21% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 81% Closely correlated | +4.20% | ||
More | ||||