Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs CIBR
BUG vs CIBR Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs CIBR
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$30.16
Change-$0.14 (-0.46%)
Volume$1.05K
Net Assets935.32M
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$72.14
Change-$0.28 (-0.39%)
Volume$2.79K
Net Assets10.95B
BUG vs CIBR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. CIBR commentary
Jan 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a Hold and CIBR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. BUG (935M). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: CIBR (1.358) vs BUG (-0.525). BUG was incepted earlier than CIBR: BUG (6 years) vs CIBR (11 years). BUG (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). BUG has a higher turnover CIBR (21.00) vs CIBR (21.00).
| BUG | CIBR | BUG / CIBR | |
| Gain YTD | -0.525 | 1.358 | -39% |
| Net Assets | 935M | 11B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.59 | 86% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 21.00 | 114% |
| Yield | 0.04 | 0.42 | 9% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 82% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | -0.66% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 83% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -2.48% | ||
More | ||||
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with CRWD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then CRWD could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.28% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.56% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -1.19% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 74% Closely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 72% Closely correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||