Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs CIBR
BUG vs CIBR Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs CIBR
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$32.56
Change-$0.86 (-2.57%)
Volume$400
Net Assets1.07B
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$74.86
Change-$1.20 (-1.58%)
Volume$3.24K
Net Assets11.5B
BUG vs CIBR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. CIBR commentary
Nov 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a StrongBuy and CIBR is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11.5B vs. BUG (1.07B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: CIBR (20.027) vs BUG (4.145). BUG was incepted earlier than CIBR: BUG (6 years) vs CIBR (10 years). BUG (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover BUG (23.91) vs BUG (23.91).
| BUG | CIBR | BUG / CIBR | |
| Gain YTD | 4.145 | 20.027 | 21% |
| Net Assets | 1.07B | 11.5B | 9% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.59 | 86% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 39.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.23 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 28 days ago 84% | 10 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 83% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 81% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.64% | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -1.82% | ||
More | ||||
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -1.04% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -4.29% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -1.95% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | -3.77% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 71% Closely correlated | -3.95% | ||
| CYBR - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -3.41% | ||
More | ||||