Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUG vs CIBR
BUG vs CIBR Comparison
Open Charts BUG vs CIBR
Global X Cybersecurity ETF
Price$35.40
Change+$0.37 (+1.06%)
Volume$254
Net Assets1.13B
First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF
Price$75.80
Change+$0.41 (+0.54%)
Volume$720
Net Assets11B
BUG vs CIBR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUG vs. CIBR commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUG is a Hold and CIBR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CIBR has more net assets: 11B vs. BUG (1.13B). CIBR has a higher annual dividend yield than BUG: CIBR (18.969) vs BUG (9.162). BUG was incepted earlier than CIBR: BUG (6 years) vs CIBR (10 years). BUG (0.51) has a lower expense ratio than CIBR (0.59). CIBR has a higher turnover BUG (23.91) vs BUG (23.91).
| BUG | CIBR | BUG / CIBR | |
| Gain YTD | 9.162 | 18.969 | 48% |
| Net Assets | 1.13B | 11B | 10% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.51 | 0.59 | 86% |
| Turnover | 23.91 | 39.00 | 61% |
| Yield | 0.09 | 0.25 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 10 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUG | CIBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 88% | 16 days ago 89% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUG has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUG jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUG | 100% | +0.37% | ||
| ZS - BUG | 82% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| PANW - BUG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| CRWD - BUG | 79% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| ATEN - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.16% | ||
| FTNT - BUG | 73% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||
CIBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CIBR has been closely correlated with ZS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CIBR jumps, then ZS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CIBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIBR | 100% | -0.42% | ||
| ZS - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | +0.79% | ||
| CRWD - CIBR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.68% | ||
| PANW - CIBR | 80% Closely correlated | +0.75% | ||
| NET - CIBR | 73% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| FTNT - CIBR | 69% Closely correlated | -0.47% | ||
More | ||||