Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFOX vs WCMLX
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison
Open Charts BUFOX vs WCMLX
Buffalo Early Stage Growth Fd
Price$16.81
Change-$0.58 (-3.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets68.51M
WCM Small Cap Growth Institutional
Price$14.64
Change+$0.83 (+6.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets47.08M
BUFOX vs WCMLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFOX vs. WCMLX commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFOX is a Hold and WCMLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUFOX has more cash in the bank: 68.5M vs. WCMLX (47.1M). BUFOX (0.00) and WCMLX (0.00) have matching dividends . BUFOX was incepted earlier than WCMLX: BUFOX (22 years) vs WCMLX (6 years). WCMLX (1.79) is less costly to investors than BUFOX (1.39). WCMLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 83.00 vs. BUFOX (18.00). BUFOX has a lower initial minimum investment than WCMLX: BUFOX (2500) vs WCMLX (100000). WCMLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.52 vs. BUFOX (-0.47). WCMLX return over 5 years is better than : -5.30 vs. BUFOX (-31.16).
| BUFOX | WCMLX | BUFOX / WCMLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 0.99 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.39 | 1.79 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.446 | 6.395 | 54% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 100000 | 3% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 68.5M | 47.1M | 145% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | 8.52 | -6% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.00 | 19.51 | 15% |
| Returns for 5 years | -31.16 | -5.30 | 588% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.85 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement