Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFEX vs RGAHX
BUFEX vs RGAHX Comparison
Open Charts BUFEX vs RGAHX
Buffalo Blue Chip Growth
Price$58.96
Change+$0.22 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.08M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R5E
Price$83.30
Change+$0.28 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets328.1B
BUFEX vs RGAHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFEX vs. RGAHX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFEX is a Buy and RGAHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAHX has more cash in the bank: 328B vs. BUFEX (162M). RGAHX pays higher dividends than BUFEX: RGAHX (0.47) vs BUFEX (0.00). BUFEX was incepted earlier than RGAHX: BUFEX (30 years) vs RGAHX (10 years). BUFEX (0.89) is less costly to investors than RGAHX (0.44). BUFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. RGAHX (25.00). RGAHX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFEX: RGAHX (250) vs BUFEX (2500). RGAHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.89 vs. BUFEX (16.59). BUFEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.61 vs. RGAHX (49.57).
| BUFEX | RGAHX | BUFEX / RGAHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.44 | 202% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.44 | 202% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.226 | 13.426 | 69% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 162M | 328B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.47 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.59 | 17.89 | 93% |
| Returns for 3 years | 76.53 | 58.90 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.61 | 49.57 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 134.02 | N/A | - |