Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUFEX vs CGFAX
BUFEX vs CGFAX Comparison
Open Charts BUFEX vs CGFAX
Buffalo Blue Chip Growth
Price$60.56
Change+$0.31 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets165.64M
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer 529A
Price$85.15
Change+$0.46 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets332.38B
BUFEX vs CGFAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUFEX vs. CGFAX commentary
Sep 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUFEX is a Buy and CGFAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CGFAX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. BUFEX (166M). CGFAX pays higher dividends than BUFEX: CGFAX (0.32) vs BUFEX (0.00). BUFEX was incepted earlier than CGFAX: BUFEX (30 years) vs CGFAX (24 years). BUFEX (0.89) is less costly to investors than CGFAX (0.65). BUFEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 53.00 vs. CGFAX (25.00). CGFAX has a lower initial minimum investment than BUFEX: CGFAX (250) vs BUFEX (2500). CGFAX (21.56) and BUFEX (21.44) have marching annual gain over last year. BUFEX return over 5 years is better than : 47.64 vs. CGFAX (45.20).
| BUFEX | CGFAX | BUFEX / CGFAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.65 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.89 | 0.65 | 137% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.190 | 16.389 | 74% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 166M | 332B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.32 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.44 | 21.56 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 72.69 | 53.25 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.64 | 45.20 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.14 | 106.51 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers