BUDFF vs HKHHF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUDFF is a Hold and HKHHF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BUDFF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHKHHF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BUDFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- HKHHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Price Growth
BUDFF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) experienced а -2.81% price change this week, while HKHHF (@Beverages: Alcoholic) price change was -4.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Alcoholic industry was -2.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -14.46%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Beverages: Alcoholic (-2.23% weekly)The alcoholic beverage market includes beer, wine, and spirits. From $230 billion in 2015, the industry has grown to around $250 billion by 2019. In recent years, alcoholic beverage makers have been looking to expand distribution and purchase channels, such as through online stores (e.g. e-commerce platform Drizly) and convenience stores. Anheuser-Busch In Bev and Diageo are major global alcoholic beverage companies, while U.S.-owned companies include Constellation Brands and Brown-Forman Corp. among several others.
| BUDFF | HKHHF | BUDFF / HKHHF | |
| Capitalization | 114B | 23.4B | 487% |
| EBITDA | 14.4B | 6.54B | 220% |
| Gain YTD | -12.918 | -23.954 | 54% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.50 | 16.37 | 95% |
| Revenue | 58.8B | 28.7B | 205% |
| Total Cash | 10.1B | 2.77B | 365% |
| Total Debt | 80B | 16.4B | 488% |
BUDFF | HKHHF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 67 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 29 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | 97 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 78 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HKHHF's Valuation (29) in the null industry is in the same range as BUDFF (44). This means that HKHHF’s stock grew similarly to BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
HKHHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as BUDFF (100). This means that HKHHF’s stock grew similarly to BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
BUDFF's SMR Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as HKHHF (97). This means that BUDFF’s stock grew similarly to HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
BUDFF's Price Growth Rating (78) in the null industry is in the same range as HKHHF (78). This means that BUDFF’s stock grew similarly to HKHHF’s over the last 12 months.
HKHHF's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BUDFF (86). This means that HKHHF’s stock grew significantly faster than BUDFF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
BUDFF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BUDFF and CABJF have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUDFF and CABJF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUDFF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUDFF | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| CABJF - BUDFF | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.41% | ||
| HKHHF - BUDFF | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.53% | ||
| BUD - BUDFF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| BDWBF - BUDFF | 15% Poorly correlated | -3.47% | ||
| ABEV - BUDFF | 6% Poorly correlated | -0.45% | ||
More | ||||
HKHHF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HKHHF has been loosely correlated with HINKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HKHHF jumps, then HINKF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HKHHF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HKHHF | 100% | -3.58% | ||
| HINKF - HKHHF | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| PDRDF - HKHHF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.47% | ||
| CABGY - HKHHF | 23% Poorly correlated | -2.41% | ||
| BUDFF - HKHHF | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.72% | ||
| CABJF - HKHHF | 21% Poorly correlated | -2.38% | ||
More | ||||