Advertisement
BTSGU vs CWB
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSGU is a Hold and CWB is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTSGU’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while.
- BTSGU’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTSGU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BTSGU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
BTSGU (@Services to the Health Industry) experienced а +11.84% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.60%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Services to the Health Industry (+0.12% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| BTSGU | CWB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 3 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 42% | 3 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| WEBS | 20.26 | 0.12 | +0.60% |
| Direxion Daily Dow Jones Int Br 3X ETF | |||
| GCV | 4.00 | 0.02 | +0.38% |
| Gabelli Convertible and Income Securities Fund (The) | |||
| LCDS | 60.23 | N/A | N/A |
| JPMorgan Fundamental Data Sci Lg Cor ETF | |||
| EWA | 26.74 | -0.17 | -0.63% |
| iShares MSCI Australia ETF | |||
| SFLO | 27.91 | -0.30 | -1.07% |
| VictoryShares Small Cap Fr CA Flw ETF | |||
BTSGU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTSGU has been closely correlated with BTSG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BTSGU jumps, then BTSG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTSGU | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTSGU | 100% | +1.00% | ||
| BTSG - BTSGU | 91% Closely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| DUOL - BTSGU | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.59% | ||
| AVPT - BTSGU | 39% Loosely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| PAR - BTSGU | 39% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
| TEAM - BTSGU | 39% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
CWB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CWB has been loosely correlated with GCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CWB jumps, then GCI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CWB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CWB | 100% | -0.41% | ||
| GCI - CWB | 52% Loosely correlated | -2.07% | ||
| TTWO - CWB | 45% Loosely correlated | -1.26% | ||
| BTSGU - CWB | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| SO - CWB | 0% Poorly correlated | -0.63% |