BTSDF
Price
$1.26
Change
-$0.04 (-3.08%)
Updated
Dec 27 closing price
Capitalization
953.98M
WWNTY
Price
$36.05
Change
-$0.89 (-2.41%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
8.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTSDF vs WWNTY

Header iconBTSDF vs WWNTY Comparison
Open Charts BTSDF vs WWNTYBanner chart's image
Health & Happiness International Holdings
Price$1.26
Change-$0.04 (-3.08%)
Volume$101
Capitalization953.98M
Want Want China Holdings
Price$36.05
Change-$0.89 (-2.41%)
Volume$12.84K
Capitalization8.59B
BTSDF vs WWNTY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
WWNTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTSDF vs. WWNTY commentary
Aug 11, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTSDF is a Hold and WWNTY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 11, 2025
Stock price -- (BTSDF: $1.26 vs. WWNTY: $36.05)
Brand notoriety: BTSDF and WWNTY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTSDF: 100% vs. WWNTY: 598%
Market capitalization -- BTSDF: $953.98M vs. WWNTY: $8.59B
BTSDF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $953.98M. WWNTY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $8.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.93B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTSDF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWWNTY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BTSDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WWNTY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, WWNTY is a better buy in the long-term than BTSDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

WWNTY’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • WWNTY’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

BTSDF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while WWNTY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +834.71%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.82% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WWNTY($8.59B) has a higher market cap than BTSDF($954M). BTSDF has higher P/E ratio than WWNTY: BTSDF (21.24) vs WWNTY (14.11). WWNTY YTD gains are higher at: 33.841 vs. BTSDF (0.000).
BTSDFWWNTYBTSDF / WWNTY
Capitalization954M8.59B11%
EBITDAN/A5.77B-
Gain YTD0.00033.841-
P/E Ratio21.2414.11151%
RevenueN/A23.2B-
Total CashN/A7.86B-
Total DebtN/A6.46B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BTSDF vs WWNTY: Fundamental Ratings
BTSDF
WWNTY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10064
SMR RATING
1..100
7718
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5642
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
833
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BTSDF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTY (19). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to WWNTY’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's Profit vs Risk Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTSDF (100). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BTSDF (77). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew somewhat faster than BTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

WWNTY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as BTSDF (56). This means that WWNTY’s stock grew similarly to BTSDF’s over the last 12 months.

BTSDF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as WWNTY (33). This means that BTSDF’s stock grew similarly to WWNTY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTSDFWWNTY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
15%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
WWNTY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TETIX14.450.15
+1.05%
RBC Enterprise I
PCCOX63.570.53
+0.84%
T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research I
FMCLX15.50N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Mid-Cap Index R6
TIOTX16.41-0.01
-0.06%
Nuveen International Opps Retire
ARYYX13.34-0.05
-0.37%
American Century Global Real Estate Y

BTSDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTSDF and LSF have been poorly correlated (+5% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTSDF and LSF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTSDF
1D Price
Change %
BTSDF100%
N/A
LSF - BTSDF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.49%
WLMIY - BTSDF
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
WWNTY - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGAAF - BTSDF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FSRCY - BTSDF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

WWNTY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WWNTY and ATPC have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WWNTY and ATPC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWNTY
1D Price
Change %
WWNTY100%
N/A
ATPC - WWNTY
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.49%
WLMIY - WWNTY
17%
Poorly correlated
+0.37%
WLMIF - WWNTY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTSDF - WWNTY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WWNTF - WWNTY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More