BTRYF
Price
$0.41
Change
+$0.13 (+46.43%)
Updated
Dec 23 closing price
Capitalization
112.95M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MP
Price
$54.54
Change
+$0.33 (+0.61%)
Updated
Dec 24 closing price
Capitalization
9.67B
56 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTRYF vs MP

Header iconBTRYF vs MP Comparison
Open Charts BTRYF vs MPBanner chart's image
WARATAH MINERALS
Price$0.41
Change+$0.13 (+46.43%)
Volume$100
Capitalization112.95M
MP Materials
Price$54.54
Change+$0.33 (+0.61%)
Volume$2.36M
Capitalization9.67B
BTRYF vs MP Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTRYF vs. MP commentary
Dec 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTRYF is a Hold and MP is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2025
Stock price -- (BTRYF: $0.41 vs. MP: $54.54)
Brand notoriety: BTRYF and MP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTRYF: 1% vs. MP: 23%
Market capitalization -- BTRYF: $112.95M vs. MP: $9.67B
BTRYF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $112.95M. MP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.67B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTRYF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTRYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MP is a better buy in the long-term than BTRYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTRYF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MP’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTRYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MP’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTRYF is a better buy in the short-term than MP.

Price Growth

BTRYF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +34.26% price change this week, while MP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +4.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +8.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +16.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +60.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

MP is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+8.44% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MP($9.67B) has a higher market cap than BTRYF($113M). BTRYF YTD gains are higher at: 345.109 vs. MP (249.615). BTRYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -23.3M vs. MP (-47.16M).
BTRYFMPBTRYF / MP
Capitalization113M9.67B1%
EBITDA-23.3M-47.16M49%
Gain YTD345.109249.615138%
P/E RatioN/A770.50-
RevenueN/A233M-
Total CashN/A1.94B-
Total DebtN/A997M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTRYFMP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTRYF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MAHMF39.99N/A
N/A
Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd.
YLWDF8.38N/A
N/A
Yellow Pages Ltd.
BLTMF0.09N/A
N/A
Orbec Gold Mines Inc.
RBTK12.22N/A
N/A
Zhen Ding Resources Inc.
DKDRF5.67N/A
N/A
NEWMED ENERGY LTD.

BTRYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTRYF and SNLGF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTRYF and SNLGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTRYF
1D Price
Change %
BTRYF100%
N/A
SNLGF - BTRYF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.91%
EMHLF - BTRYF
14%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
ELECF - BTRYF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.86%
MP - BTRYF
4%
Poorly correlated
+0.61%
MKNGF - BTRYF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MP has been loosely correlated with UAMY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MP jumps, then UAMY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MP
1D Price
Change %
MP100%
+0.61%
UAMY - MP
48%
Loosely correlated
+5.31%
USAR - MP
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.98%
LYSDY - MP
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
FSUGY - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
TMC - MP
44%
Loosely correlated
+4.24%
More