BTRCF
Price
$12.83
Change
+$0.33 (+2.64%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
692.98M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NPACY
Price
$1.05
Change
-$0.41 (-28.08%)
Updated
Sep 23 closing price
Capitalization
632.68M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTRCF vs NPACY

Header iconBTRCF vs NPACY Comparison
Open Charts BTRCF vs NPACYBanner chart's image
BETTER COLLECTIVE A S
Price$12.83
Change+$0.33 (+2.64%)
Volume$889
Capitalization692.98M
Quadient SA
Price$1.05
Change-$0.41 (-28.08%)
Volume$100
Capitalization632.68M
BTRCF vs NPACY Comparison Chart in %
BTRCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTRCF vs. NPACY commentary
Feb 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTRCF is a Hold and NPACY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 04, 2026
Stock price -- (BTRCF: $11.67 vs. NPACY: $1.05)
Brand notoriety: BTRCF and NPACY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTRCF: 36% vs. NPACY: 100%
Market capitalization -- BTRCF: $692.98M vs. NPACY: $632.68M
BTRCF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $692.98M. NPACY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $632.68M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $240.59B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $6.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTRCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNPACY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BTRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NPACY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, NPACY is a better buy in the long-term than BTRCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTRCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BTRCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BTRCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -3.39% price change this week, while NPACY (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -7.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +165.15%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-7.06% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTRCF($693M) has a higher market cap than NPACY($633M). BTRCF has higher P/E ratio than NPACY: BTRCF (24.73) vs NPACY (7.41). NPACY YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. BTRCF (-4.246). NPACY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 242M vs. BTRCF (82M). NPACY has more cash in the bank: 124M vs. BTRCF (23.4M). BTRCF has less debt than NPACY: BTRCF (272M) vs NPACY (835M). NPACY has higher revenues than BTRCF: NPACY (1.08B) vs BTRCF (339M).
BTRCFNPACYBTRCF / NPACY
Capitalization693M633M109%
EBITDA82M242M34%
Gain YTD-4.2460.000-
P/E Ratio24.737.41334%
Revenue339M1.08B32%
Total Cash23.4M124M19%
Total Debt272M835M33%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NPACY: Fundamental Ratings
NPACY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
89
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
61
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
44
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTRCFNPACY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTRCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFQSX7.820.08
+1.03%
Janus Henderson Global Equity Income S
FMPAX32.68N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value A
HWSIX80.10-0.28
-0.35%
Hotchkis & Wiley Small Cap Value I
GIIGX24.89-0.17
-0.68%
Gabelli International Growth I
PGIIX20.95-0.64
-2.96%
Polen Global Growth Institutional

BTRCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTRCF has been loosely correlated with KNAMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTRCF jumps, then KNAMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTRCF
1D Price
Change %
BTRCF100%
N/A
KNAMF - BTRCF
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
NPACY - BTRCF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBIIF - BTRCF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SSNC - BTRCF
23%
Poorly correlated
-10.61%
MDPEF - BTRCF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

NPACY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that NPACY and PXPHF have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NPACY and PXPHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NPACY
1D Price
Change %
NPACY100%
N/A
PXPHF - NPACY
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTRCF - NPACY
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNAI - NPACY
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BOX - NPACY
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.14%
NTDOY - NPACY
6%
Poorly correlated
-6.24%
More