Advertisement
BTRCF vs NDATF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTRCF is a Hold and NDATF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTRCF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNDATF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BTRCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NDATF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BTRCF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BTRCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
BTRCF (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while NDATF (@Services to the Health Industry) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -0.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +110.36%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Services to the Health Industry industry was +1.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.66%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-0.14% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Services to the Health Industry (+1.68% weekly)This industry comprises companies that provide services, such as equipment sterilization, research, physician management systems and consulting, that support the healthcare/medical industry. Examples of such companies include Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings, which operates one of the largest clinical laboratory networks in the world; Quest Diagnostics Inc., which is a clinical laboratory; and Syneos Health, which is a major clinical research organization.
| BTRCF | NDATF | BTRCF / NDATF | |
| Capitalization | 742M | 446K | 166,368% |
| EBITDA | 86.1M | -469.05K | -18,356% |
| Gain YTD | 24.378 | -81.833 | -30% |
| P/E Ratio | 27.29 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 341M | 887 | 38,444,194% |
| Total Cash | 22.4M | 499K | 4,489% |
| Total Debt | 273M | N/A | - |
| BTRCF | NDATF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 33% | N/A |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 38% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 24% | 2 days ago 15% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 15% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Advertisement
BTRCF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BTRCF has been loosely correlated with PEGA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BTRCF jumps, then PEGA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTRCF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTRCF | 100% | N/A | ||
| PEGA - BTRCF | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.58% | ||
| DTSS - BTRCF | 43% Loosely correlated | -10.17% | ||
| ELWS - BTRCF | 38% Loosely correlated | +9.42% | ||
| SSNC - BTRCF | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.87% | ||
| NPACY - BTRCF | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||
NDATF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NDATF has been closely correlated with NEMTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NDATF jumps, then NEMTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NDATF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDATF | 100% | N/A | ||
| NEMTF - NDATF | 71% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
| YMM - NDATF | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.31% | ||
| BTRCF - NDATF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| THNCF - NDATF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BLBX - NDATF | 23% Poorly correlated | +3.14% | ||
More | ||||