BTQQF
Price
$0.22
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 14 closing price
HUBC
Price
$0.55
Change
-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Updated
Nov 15, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Ad is loading...

BTQQF vs HUBC

Header iconBTQQF vs HUBC Comparison
Open Charts BTQQF vs HUBCBanner chart's image
BTQ Technologies
Price$0.22
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.5K
CapitalizationN/A
Hub Cyber Security
Price$0.55
Change-$0.04 (-6.78%)
Volume$12.94K
CapitalizationN/A
BTQQF vs HUBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
HUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTQQF vs. HUBC commentary
Nov 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTQQF is a Hold and HUBC is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 16, 2024
Stock price -- (BTQQF: $0.22 vs. HUBC: $0.59)
Brand notoriety: BTQQF and HUBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTQQF: 31% vs. HUBC: 108%
Market capitalization -- BTQQF: $53.97M vs. HUBC: $8.01M
BTQQF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $53.97M. HUBC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTQQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTQQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, HUBC is a better buy in the long-term than BTQQF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HUBC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • HUBC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BTQQF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -4.35% price change this week, while HUBC (@Packaged Software) price change was +10.55% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

HUBC is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2022.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-1.65% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTQQF($54M) has a higher market cap than HUBC($8.01M). BTQQF YTD gains are higher at: -63.062 vs. HUBC (-72.811). BTQQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.12M vs. HUBC (-73.46M). HUBC has higher revenues than BTQQF: HUBC (226M) vs BTQQF (0).
BTQQFHUBCBTQQF / HUBC
Capitalization54M8.01M674%
EBITDA-2.12M-73.46M3%
Gain YTD-63.062-72.81187%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0226M-
Total Cash7.62MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HUBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
0%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
HUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GME27.370.91
+3.44%
GameStop Corp
AAPL228.223.10
+1.38%
Apple
SPY593.35-3.84
-0.64%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
BTC.X87250.430000-3333.734400
-3.68%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
TSLA311.18-19.06
-5.77%
Tesla

BTQQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTQQF and INST have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTQQF and INST's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTQQF
1D Price
Change %
BTQQF100%
+3.47%
INST - BTQQF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OBIIF - BTQQF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYIDF - BTQQF
20%
Poorly correlated
+14.80%
AMJT - BTQQF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUBC - BTQQF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
More