BTQQF
Price
$6.66
Change
+$0.18 (+2.78%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
53.97M
HUBC
Price
$1.86
Change
+$0.05 (+2.76%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
8.01M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BTQQF vs HUBC

Header iconBTQQF vs HUBC Comparison
Open Charts BTQQF vs HUBCBanner chart's image
BTQ Technologies
Price$6.66
Change+$0.18 (+2.78%)
Volume$2.44M
Capitalization53.97M
Hub Cyber Security
Price$1.86
Change+$0.05 (+2.76%)
Volume$133.41K
Capitalization8.01M
BTQQF vs HUBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BTQQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BTQQF vs. HUBC commentary
Jul 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTQQF is a Buy and HUBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BTQQF: $6.66 vs. HUBC: $1.86)
Brand notoriety: BTQQF and HUBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BTQQF: 263% vs. HUBC: 16%
Market capitalization -- BTQQF: $53.97M vs. HUBC: $8.01M
BTQQF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $53.97M. HUBC’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $8.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BTQQF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileHUBC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BTQQF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • HUBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BTQQF and HUBC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BTQQF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HUBC’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BTQQF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HUBC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BTQQF is a better buy in the short-term than HUBC.

Price Growth

BTQQF (@Packaged Software) experienced а +57.08% price change this week, while HUBC (@Packaged Software) price change was -11.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.57%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+4.24% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BTQQF($54M) has a higher market cap than HUBC($8.01M). BTQQF YTD gains are higher at: 142.182 vs. HUBC (-73.043). BTQQF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.12M vs. HUBC (-73.46M). HUBC has higher revenues than BTQQF: HUBC (226M) vs BTQQF (0).
BTQQFHUBCBTQQF / HUBC
Capitalization54M8.01M674%
EBITDA-2.12M-73.46M3%
Gain YTD142.182-73.043-195%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue0226M-
Total Cash7.62MN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BTQQFHUBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
82%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BTQQF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HUBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRX0.33N/A
+1.22%
TRX Gold Corp
SYNA68.710.35
+0.51%
Synaptics
IOVA1.75N/A
N/A
Iovance Biotherapeutics
CNH13.69-0.07
-0.51%
CNH Industrial NV
AQB0.76N/A
-0.52%
AquaBounty Technologies

BTQQF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BTQQF and OBIIF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTQQF and OBIIF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BTQQF
1D Price
Change %
BTQQF100%
+2.78%
OBIIF - BTQQF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MYIDF - BTQQF
20%
Poorly correlated
-6.64%
AMJT - BTQQF
17%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HUBC - BTQQF
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.76%
AICOF - BTQQF
6%
Poorly correlated
+15.76%
More

HUBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HUBC has been loosely correlated with INTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HUBC jumps, then INTZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HUBC
1D Price
Change %
HUBC100%
+2.76%
INTZ - HUBC
44%
Loosely correlated
+8.90%
REKR - HUBC
37%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
NEOJF - HUBC
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
OCLCF - HUBC
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.02%
MRIN - HUBC
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More