It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BTOW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileIOT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
IOT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BTOW (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while IOT (@Packaged Software) price change was -1.66% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.46%.
IOT is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
BTOW | IOT | BTOW / IOT | |
Capitalization | 109K | 20.8B | 0% |
EBITDA | -920.72K | -234.39M | 0% |
Gain YTD | -67.523 | 52.516 | -129% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 0 | 937M | - |
Total Cash | 176K | 548M | 0% |
Total Debt | 1.05M | 99.5M | 1% |
BTOW | IOT | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | 11 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 12 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 96 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 38 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 70 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BTOW's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for IOT (69) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that BTOW’s stock grew somewhat faster than IOT’s over the last 12 months.
IOT's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that IOT’s stock grew significantly faster than BTOW’s over the last 12 months.
IOT's SMR Rating (96) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that IOT’s stock grew similarly to BTOW’s over the last 12 months.
IOT's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BTOW (65) in the null industry. This means that IOT’s stock grew similarly to BTOW’s over the last 12 months.
IOT's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as BTOW (100) in the null industry. This means that IOT’s stock grew similarly to BTOW’s over the last 12 months.
IOT | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago81% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago0% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago82% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BTOW and EBYH have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTOW and EBYH's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTOW | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BTOW | 100% | N/A | ||
EBYH - BTOW | 28% Poorly correlated | +18.06% | ||
CLPMF - BTOW | 26% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AKAFF - BTOW | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
IOT - BTOW | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.69% | ||
BIDCF - BTOW | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IOT has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IOT jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IOT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
IOT | 100% | -3.69% | ||
PATH - IOT | 53% Loosely correlated | -6.58% | ||
QTWO - IOT | 52% Loosely correlated | -5.30% | ||
INTU - IOT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
GWRE - IOT | 48% Loosely correlated | -0.60% | ||
BSY - IOT | 47% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
More |