Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTO vs XLF
BTO vs XLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTO vs. XLF commentary
Feb 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTO is a StrongBuy and XLF is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLF has more net assets: 55.1B vs. BTO (767M). BTO has a higher annual dividend yield than XLF: BTO (10.034) vs XLF (-2.264). BTO was incepted earlier than XLF: BTO (31 years) vs XLF (27 years). XLF (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than BTO (2.01). BTO has a higher turnover XLF (6.00) vs XLF (6.00).
| BTO | XLF | BTO / XLF | |
| Gain YTD | 10.034 | -2.264 | -443% |
| Net Assets | 767M | 55.1B | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.08 | 2,512% |
| Turnover | 13.00 | 6.00 | 217% |
| Yield | 1.25 | 1.35 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 31 years | 27 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BTO | XLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 14 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EMLC | 26.29 | 0.08 | +0.31% |
| VanEck JPMorgan EMLcl Ccy Bd ETF | |||
| PMMR | 26.15 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - March | |||
| GLU | 20.10 | -0.03 | -0.15% |
| Gabelli Utility & Income Trust (The) | |||
| OSEA | 30.31 | -0.40 | -1.29% |
| Harbor International Compounders ETF | |||
| QQQA | 54.36 | -0.72 | -1.30% |
| ProShares Nasdaq-100 Drsy Wght Momt ETF | |||
BTO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BTO and BAC have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BTO and BAC's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BTO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BTO | 100% | +0.57% | ||
| BAC - BTO | 24% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
| USB - BTO | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.32% | ||
| FITB - BTO | 20% Poorly correlated | +1.54% | ||
| HBAN - BTO | 15% Poorly correlated | +2.85% | ||
| BPOP - BTO | 15% Poorly correlated | +3.50% | ||
More | ||||
XLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLF has been closely correlated with JPM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if XLF jumps, then JPM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y