Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BTMFX vs FSMDX
BTMFX vs FSMDX Comparison
Open Charts BTMFX vs FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index
Price$38.48
Change+$0.08 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets45.79B
BTMFX vs FSMDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BTMFX vs. FSMDX commentary
Jan 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BTMFX is a Hold and FSMDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMDX has more cash in the bank: 45.8B vs. BTMFX (212M). FSMDX pays higher dividends than BTMFX: FSMDX (1.10) vs BTMFX (0.71). BTMFX was incepted earlier than FSMDX: BTMFX (18 years) vs FSMDX (14 years). BTMFX (0.98) is less costly to investors than FSMDX (0.03). BTMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.14 vs. FSMDX (15.00). FSMDX has a lower initial minimum investment than BTMFX: FSMDX (0) vs BTMFX (100000). FSMDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.11 vs. BTMFX (-1.05). FSMDX return over 5 years is better than : 45.72 vs. BTMFX (13.64).
| BTMFX | FSMDX | BTMFX / FSMDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,920% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.98 | 0.03 | 3,920% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.531 | 3.981 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 212M | 45.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.71 | 1.10 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.05 | 15.11 | -7% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.12 | 45.52 | 20% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.64 | 45.72 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.16 | 187.52 | 45% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers